+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: a treatment planning comparison



Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: a treatment planning comparison



RadioTherapy and Oncology 98(1): 74-80



To compare helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) on early stage prostate cancer treatments delivered with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in moderate hypofractionation. Eight patients treated with HT were replanned with two-field IMPT (2fIMPT) and five-field IMPT (5fIMPT), using a small pencil beam size (3 mm sigma). The prescribed dose was 74.3 Gy in 28 fractions on PTV1 (prostate) and PTV2 (proximal seminal vesicles), 65.5 Gy on PTV3 (distal seminal vesicles) and on the overlap between rectum and PTVs. IMPT and HT achieved similar target coverage and dose homogeneity, with 5fIMPT providing the best results. The conformity indexes of IMPT were significantly lower for PTV1+2 and PTV3. Above 65 Gy, HT and IMPT were equivalent in the rectum, while IMPT spared the bladder and the penile bulb from 0 to 70 Gy. From 0 up to 60 Gy, IMPT dosimetric values were (much) lower for all OARs except the femur heads, where HT was better than 2fIMPT in the 25-35 Gy dose range. OARs mean doses were typically reduced by 30-50% by IMPT. NTCPs for the rectum were within 1% between the two techniques, except when the endpoint was stool frequency, where IMPT showed a small (though statistically significant) benefit. HT and IMPT produce similar dose distributions in the target volume. The current knowledge on dose-effect relations does not allow to quantify the clinical impact of the large sparing of IMPT at medium-to-low doses.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053503191

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21176983

DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.10.027


Related references

Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of dominant intraprostatic lesion: a treament planning comparison. RadioTherapy and Oncology 107(2): 207-212, 2014

Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison. Radiation Oncology 10: 91, 2016

Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus helical tomotherapy in nasopharynx cancer: planning comparison and NTCP evaluation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 72(2): 589-596, 2008

Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) vs. helicoidal tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of nasopharynx cancer: A planning comparison. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 69(3): S663, 2007

Intensity modulated proton and photon therapy for early prostate cancer with or without transperineal injection of a polyethylen glycol spacer: a treatment planning comparison study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 84(3): E311-E318, 2012

Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3-dimensional conformal therapy for the treatment of T1N0 glottic cancer. Medical Dosimetry 41(4): 329-333, 2016

Re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck carcinomas: comparison of robust intensity modulated proton therapy treatment plans with helical tomotherapy. Radiation Oncology 8: 93, 2014

A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 60(3): 84-92, 2013

A treatment planning study comparing helical tomotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer. RadioTherapy and Oncology 94(1): 60-66, 2010

Comparison of spinal Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) planning techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy. Medical Dosimetry 42(3): 210-215, 2017

SU-E-T-569: A Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy versus Intensity Modulated Proton for Lung Cancer. Medical Physics 39(6part19): 3836, 2012

Dosimetric Comparison of Uniform Scanning Proton Therapy, Helical Tomotherapy, and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Bilateral Orbital Lymphoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 78(3): S806-S807, 2010

Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 80(5): 1589-1600, 2011

A treatment planning study comparing tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, Sliding Window and proton therapy for low-risk prostate carcinoma. Radiation Oncology 11(1): 128, 2016

Improved beam angle arrangement in intensity modulated proton therapy treatment planning for localized prostate cancer. Cancers 7(2): 574-584, 2015