+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hygienic guidance values for wipe sampling of antineoplastic drugs in Swedish hospitals

Hygienic guidance values for wipe sampling of antineoplastic drugs in Swedish hospitals

Journal of Environmental Monitoring 14(7): 1968-1975

The use of antineoplastic drugs in health care steadily increases. Health care workers can be occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs classified as carcinogenic or teratogenic. Monitoring of surface contamination is a common way to assess occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs, since wipe sampling is used as a surrogate measure of dermal exposure. Since no occupational limits for antineoplastic drugs in work environments exist, 'hygienic guidance values' (HGVs) should be used instead. HGVs are practicable, achievable levels, not health based, and can be calculated from exposure data from representative workplaces with good occupational hygiene practices. So far, guidance values for surface monitoring of antineoplastic drugs only exist for pharmacies where antineoplastic drugs are prepared. The objective was to propose HGVs for surface monitoring of cyclophosphamide (CP) and ifosfamide (IF) in Swedish hospitals where antineoplastic drugs are administered to patients. In total, 17 workplaces located at six hospitals in Sweden were surveyed by wipe sampling. Wipe samples were collected, worked up and then analyzed with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Surface contamination of CP and IF was found on 80% and 73% of the sampled surfaces, thus indicating that there is potential for health care workers to be exposed to CP and IF via the skin. The median surface load of CP was 3.3 pg cm(-2) (range <0.05-10,800 pg cm(-2)). The corresponding value for IF was 4.2 pg cm(-2) (range <0.13-95,000 pg cm(-2)). The highest surface loads were found on the floors. The proposed HGVs were set at 90th percentile values, and can be applicable to hospital workplaces where patients are treated with CP or IF. Surface monitoring combined with HGVs is a useful tool for health care workers to regularly benchmark their own surface loads which could control and reduce the occupational exposure to CP and IF in hospital workplaces. Thus, the occupational safety of the health care workers will be increased.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053626497

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22692549

DOI: 10.1039/c2em10704j

Related references

A review of surface wipe sampling compared to biologic monitoring for occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 14(3): 159-174, 2017

A surface wipe sampling and LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of six antineoplastic drugs commonly handled by healthcare workers. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 407(23): 7083-7092, 2015

Guidance values for surface monitoring of antineoplastic drugs in German pharmacies. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 53(7): 703-711, 2009

Surface wipe sampling for antineoplastic (chemotherapy) and other hazardous drug residue in healthcare settings: Methodology and recommendations. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 13(9): 658-667, 2016

Micro-liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for the analysis of antineoplastic drugs from wipe samples. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 408(28): 8221-8229, 2016

Wipe sampling procedure coupled to LC-MS/MS analysis for the simultaneous determination of 10 cytotoxic drugs on different surfaces. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 402(8): 2499-2509, 2012

Environmental and biological monitoring of antineoplastic drugs in four workplaces in a Swedish hospital. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 81(7): 899-911, 2008

Handling of antineoplastic drugs in Washington hospitals. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 41(3): 446 449, 1984

Antineoplastic drugs as an occupational hazard in hospitals. Annals of Internal Medicine 103(3): 473, 1985

Wipe sampling of amphetamine-type stimulants and recreational drugs on selected household surfaces with analysis by ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 254-255: 46-56, 2013

Antineoplastic drugs contamination of workplace surfaces in two Portuguese hospitals. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186(11): 7807-7818, 2014

Hygienic and bacteriological comparative studies in 50 hospitals part 6 efficacy of hospital hygienic instruction with respect to 6 hospitals. Zentralblatt fuer Bakteriologie Parasitenkunde Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene Erste Abteilung Originale Reihe B Hygiene Krankenhaushygiene Betriebshygiene Praeventive Medizin 165(5-6): 381-392, 1977

Multicenter study of environmental contamination with antineoplastic drugs in 33 Canadian hospitals. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 87(3): 307-313, 2014

Compliance with safe handling guidelines of antineoplastic drugs in Jordanian hospitals. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 21(1): 3-9, 2015

Hygienic and bacteriological comparative studies in 50 hospitals. VI. The efficacy of a hospital-hygienic instruction regarding 6 hospitals. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie Parasitenkunde Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. Erste Abteilung Originale. Reihe B: Hygiene Praventive Medizin 165(5-6): 381-392, 1977