+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

ISAT subgroups: is aneurysm clipping better for some patients?



ISAT subgroups: is aneurysm clipping better for some patients?



Neurosurgery 63(6): 14




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053650768

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19057309

DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000313633.74773.E7


Related references

International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366(9488): 809-817, 2005

Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 38(5): 1538-1544, 2007

Intraoperative Aneurysm Rupture During Microsurgical Clipping: Risk Re-evaluation in the Post-International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Era. World Neurosurgery 119: E349-E356, 2018

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 11(6): 304-314, 2007

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised trial. Lancet (North American Edition) 360(9342): 1267-1274, 2002

Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet. Neurology 8(5): 427-433, 2009

Occurrence and impact of delayed cerebral ischemia after coiling and after clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Journal of Neurology 259(4): 679-683, 2012

The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 385(9969): 691-697, 2015

ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping?. Surgical Neurology 59(3): 162-5; Discussion 165-73; Author Reply 173-5, 2003

ISAT: end of the debate on coiling versus clipping?. Lancet 385(9984): 2251, 2015

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II: comparison of clipping vs coiling: key questions. Are the results of the study generalizable? Should clipping be done for patients less than 40 years of age?. Surgical Neurology 70(1): 104-107, 2008

Microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms after the ISAT Study. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement 94: 3-6, 2005

ISAT: coiling or clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms?. Lancet. Neurology 4(12): 791-792, 2005

ISAT trial: coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysms?. Lancet 366(9488): 783-785, 2005

Outcome in patients presenting with an aneurysm related intracerebral haemorrhage in the post-ISAT era. British Journal of Neurosurgery 27(2): 194-197, 2013