+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Image quality evaluation of new image reconstruction methods applying the iterative reconstruction



Image quality evaluation of new image reconstruction methods applying the iterative reconstruction



Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 68(4): 404-412



The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of an iterative reconstruction method, the iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS), which was implemented in a 128-slices multi-detector computed tomography system (MDCT), Siemens Somatom Definition Flash (Definition). We evaluated image noise by standard deviation (SD) as many researchers did before, and in addition, we measured modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and perceptual low-contrast detectability using a water phantom including a low-contrast object with a 10 Hounsfield unit (HU) contrast, to evaluate whether the noise reduction of IRIS was effective. The SD and NPS were measured from the images of a water phantom. The MTF was measured from images of a thin metal wire and a bar pattern phantom with the bar contrast of 125 HU. The NPS of IRIS was lower than that of filtered back projection (FBP) at middle and high frequency regions. The SD values were reduced by 21%. The MTF of IRIS and FBP measured by the wire phantom coincided precisely. However, for the bar pattern phantom, the MTF values of IRIS at 0.625 and 0.833 cycle/mm were lower than those of FBP. Despite the reduction of the SD and the NPS, the low-contrast detectability study indicated no significant difference between IRIS and FBP. From these results, it was demonstrated that IRIS had the noise reduction performance with exact preservation for high contrast resolution and slight degradation of middle contrast resolution, and could slightly improve the low contrast detectability but with no significance.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053683834

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22516592

DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2012_jsrt_68.4.404


Related references

Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for liver CT scans for image noise reduction and image quality improvement: evaluation of the optimal iterative reconstruction strengths. La Radiologia Medica 120(3): 259-267, 2015

Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 42(2): 184-190, 2017

Low-dose chest computed tomography with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction, iterative reconstruction in image space, and filtered back projection: studies on image quality. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 37(4): 610-617, 2013

Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). European Radiology 25(1): 140-146, 2015

Optimization of the alpha image reconstruction - an iterative CT-image reconstruction with well-defined image quality metrics. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 27(3): 180-192, 2017

Quality evaluation of image-based iterative reconstruction for CT: Comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2019, 2019

Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose saving comparing knowledge model-based iterative reconstruction on 80-kV CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with hybrid iterative reconstruction on 100-kV CT. Emergency Radiology 2018, 2018

Improved image quality in dual-energy abdominal CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction in image space and filtered back projection reconstruction. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 199(2): 402-406, 2012

Comparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality and Image-Reconstruction Times. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2019, 2019

Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. European Journal of Radiology 84(9): 1715-1723, 2016

CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: image quality of ultralow-dose (Sub mSv) CT with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction and diagnostic performance of low-dose CT with statistical iterative reconstruction. Abdominal Imaging 40(7): 2432-2440, 2016

Electrocardiography-Gated Computed Tomography of the Bronchial Arteries With Iterative Image Reconstruction: Clinical Evaluation and Image Quality. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 41(6): 970-975, 2017

CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. European Radiology 23(1): 125-132, 2013

Task-based image quality evaluation of iterative reconstruction methods for low dose CT using computer simulations. Physics in Medicine and Biology 60(7): 2881-2901, 2015

The principle of the image reconstruction method applying the iterative reconstruction and clinical application in tomosynthesis. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 69(4): 457-463, 2013