+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Impact of cochlear nerve deficiency determined using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging on hearing outcome in children with cochlear implants



Impact of cochlear nerve deficiency determined using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging on hearing outcome in children with cochlear implants



Otology and Neurotology 36(1): 14-21



1) To review the radiologic and audiologic data of 656 children with sensorineural hearing impairment who underwent 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our cochlear implant (CI) center to understand the incidence of cochlear nerve deficiency (CND); and 2) to compare postimplant auditory and speech intelligibility outcomes in implantees with cochlear nerve (CN) aplasia, CN hypoplasia, and normal CN. A retrospective cohort study. A tertiary medical center. A total of 656 patients (aged 0-18 yr; mean, 4.5 ± 4.3 yr) who underwent MRI in our center during May 2000 to December 2012. The radiologic/audiologic data were reviewed. The postimplant outcomes of 13 implantees with CND (7 aplasia and 6 hypoplasia) were compared with 50 non-CND implantees using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales. Upon MRI, 139 patients (21.2%) exhibited CND. Bilateral CN aplasia occurred in 4.3% of the patients with severe-to-profound deafness (588 cases) and in one-fifth of patients with CND. The aplasia group showed significantly worse postimplant CAP (p = 0.002) and SIR (p = 0.009) scores than the non-CND group. No significant difference was noted between the hypoplasia group and the non-CND group. Although the audiologic and radiologic results may be incompatible, the majority of patients with CND may be well delineated preoperatively using MRI. The type of CND (aplasia/hypoplasia) may affect CI outcomes. Patients implanted on the side with CN hypoplasia are more likely to exhibit favorable results compared with patients implanted on the side with CN aplasia.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053714115

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25226378

DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000568


Related references

Cochlear nerve size evaluation in children with sensorineural hearing loss by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. American Journal of Otolaryngology 27(3): 166-172, 2006

Cochlear nerve diameters on multipoint measurements and effects of aging in normal-hearing children using 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 79(7): 1077-1080, 2015

A Comparison of Cochlear Nerve Size in Normal-Hearing Adults Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of International Advanced Otology 13(3): 300-303, 2017

Cochlear nerve diameter in normal hearing ears using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 119(10): 2042-2045, 2009

Cochlear nerve aplasia and hypoplasia: diagnosis with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Cochlear Implants International 5(Suppl. 1): 153-155, 2004

Evaluation of cochlear nerve size by magnetic resonance imaging in elderly patients with sensorineural hearing loss. La Radiologia Medica 115(3): 483-487, 2010

Spatial acuity in 2-to-3-year-old children with normal acoustic hearing, unilateral cochlear implants, and bilateral cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 33(5): 561-572, 2012

The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency. Ear and Hearing 39(3): 482-494, 2018

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of hearing-impaired children under sedation before cochlear implantation. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 133(7): 677-683, 2007

Profound hearing loss attributable to cochlear nerve disease: diagnosis with combination of otoacoustic emission and magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 109(11): 1820-1824, 1999

From hearing screening to cochlear implantation: cochlear implants in children under 3 years of age. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 128(4): 369-372, 2008

Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 15(1): 44-56, 2010

Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: Are we truly practicing MRI safety?. Laryngoscope 129(2): 482-489, 2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cochlear Implants and Auditory Brain Stem Implants. Cochlear Implants International 11(Suppl.-2): 48-51, 2010

Magnetic resonance imaging after cochlear implants. Journal of Otology 14(1): 22-25, 2019