+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Impaired glucose regulation is associated with poorer performance on the Stroop Task



Impaired glucose regulation is associated with poorer performance on the Stroop Task



Physiology and Behavior 122: 113-119



Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for development of cognitive dysfunction. Impairments in glucose regulation have been associated with poorer performance on tests of executive function and information processing speed. We administered the Stroop Color Word Task, where higher interference scores are indicative of decreased selective attention, to 98 non-diabetic volunteers (64 m; %fat=37 ± 12; age=36 ± 9 yrs, race=41 NA/30 C/13 H/14 AA) on our inpatient unit. After 3d on a weight maintaining diet, % body fat was measured by DXA and a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered. Impaired glucose regulation (IGR) was defined as: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 100 and ≤ 125 mg/dL and/or 2h plasma glucose between ≥ 140 and ≤ 199 mg/dL (IGR; n=48; NGR; n=50). Total and incremental area under the curve (AUC) for insulin and glucose were calculated. Stroop interference scores were not significantly associated with any measure of adiposity or insulin concentrations. Individuals with IGR had significantly higher interference scores than those with normal glucose regulation (NGR; p=0.003). Higher interference scores were significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose concentrations (r=0.26, p=0.007) and total glucose AUC (r=0.30, p=0.02) and only trending so for iAUC and 2h plasma glucose (r=0.18, p=0.08; r=0.17, p=0.09 respectively). In separate multivariate linear models, fasting plasma glucose (p=0.002) and total glucose AUC (p=0.0005) remained significant predictors of Stroop interference scores, even after adjustment for age, sex, race, education and %fat. Individuals with IGR had decreased performance on a test of selective attention. Fasting plasma glucose was more strongly associated with lower performance scores than 2h plasma glucose. Our results indicate that even mild hyperglycemia in the non-diabetic range is associated with attentional processing difficulties in a sample of younger adults. Whether these impairments precede or are induced by impaired glucose regulation is not clear.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053729603

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24036382

DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.001


Related references

Depressive symptoms and poorer performance on the Stroop Task are associated with weight gain. Physiology and Behavior 186: 25-30, 2018

Depressive symptoms and poorer performance on the Stroop Task are associated with weight gain. Physiology & Behavior 186: 25-30, 2018

Oscillatory brain dynamics supporting impaired Stroop task performance in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Schizophrenia Research 204: 146-154, 2019

The Modified Stroop Task Is Susceptible to Feigning: Stroop Performance and Symptom Over-endorsement in Feigned Test Anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1195, 2018

Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1182, 2014

Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Research 873(1): 102-111, 4 August, 2000

The effects of age and task context on Stroop task performance. Memory and Cognition 33(3): 514-530, 2005

Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return. Memory and Cognition 37(6): 935-944, 2009

The Emotional Stroop as an Emotion Regulation Task. Experimental Aging Research 42(2): 161-194, 2016

Male Internet addicts show impaired executive control ability: evidence from a color-word Stroop task. Neuroscience Letters 499(2): 114-118, 2011

Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 24(1): 181-191, 2005

Worrying and performance on the Stroop task in women. Psychiatria Polska 43(1): 41-51, 2009

Expertise and performance on the emotional Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 88(3 Pt 2): 1361-1362, 1999

Differential facilitative effects of glucose administration on Stroop task conditions. Behavioral Neuroscience 127(6): 932-935, 2013

Emotional priming effects during Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 49(3): 2662-2670, 2010