+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up



Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up



Journal of Oral Implantology 40(6): 699-706



To assess the survival rate of implants placed in the nasopalatine canal for the rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxillae and the level of satisfaction of these patients. A retrospective study was performed between 2000 and 2009 of patients with severe atrophy of edentulous maxillae (Cawood and Howell's class V) rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses with 1 implant placed in the nasopalatine canal. A preoperative computed tomography scan was obtained of all patients and all surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The following parameters were assessed: neurosensory status of the anterior palate (using the pointed/blunt discrimination method); implant success rate according to criteria described by Albrektsson et al; patient satisfaction with the prosthetic treatment (using visual analogue scales). Thirteen patients with a mean age of 54.8 years were treated, 5 men and 8 women. Seventy-eight implants were placed: 13 in the nasopalatine canal, 6 in the zygomatic bone, 12 in the pterygomaxillary region, 2 in the frontomaxillary buttress and 45 in other locations. Six patients reported a slight decrease in sensitivity in the anterior palate after surgery, which disappeared in all cases within a few weeks. Two early failures (before prosthetic loading) and no late failures (after prosthetic loading) of nasopalatine implants were recorded, yielding a success rate for these implants of 84.6% after a mean follow-up of 70 months (range 24 to 132 months. High patient satisfaction with the prosthetic restoration was generally achieved in terms of comfort, stability, function, esthetics, and ease of cleaning. Residual bone is associated with the nasopalatine canal, even in patients with severe maxillary atrophy. This canal may be considered a possible location for an anterior implant when rehabilitating atrophic patients using implant-supported prostheses.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053733236

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23397941

DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00145


Related references

Palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants to support fixed full-arch prostheses: Controlled retrospective study with 5 years of follow-up. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 20(3): E357-E364, 2016

Palatal positioning of implants in severely atrophic edentulous maxillae: five-year cross-sectional retrospective follow-up study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 28(4): 1140-1146, 2013

Retrospective Analysis of 129 Consecutive Zygomatic Implants Used to Rehabilitate Severely Resorbed Maxillae in a Two-Stage Protocol. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 32(2): 377–384, 2017

Clinical Outcomes of Bicortical Engagement Implants in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Retrospective Study with 1 to 5 Years Follow-up. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 38(5): E96–e104, 2018

A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 100(5): 354-366, 2008

The nasopalatine canal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 24(5): 936-942, 2009

Implant Anchorage in the Nasopalatine Canal for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla. Implant Dentistry 26(2): 324-327, 2017

Dental implants placed in severely atrophic jaws reconstructed with autogenous calvarium, bovine bone mineral, and collagen membranes: A 3- to 19-year retrospective follow-up study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 29(7): 725-740, 2018

Satisfaction and quality of life with palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants supporting fixed full-arch prostheses. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 20(6): E751, 2015

Survival rate of osseointegrated implants in atrophic maxillae grafted with calvarial bone: a retrospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 44(2): 239-244, 2015

Reconstruction of severely resorbed atrophic maxillae and management with transitional implants. Implant Dentistry 9(3): 271-277, 2000

Endosteal implants and iliac crest grafts to restore severely resorbed totally edentulous maxillae--a retrospective study. Journal of Oral Implantology 20(2): 100-110, 1994

Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 13(4): 474-482, 1998

Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. Journal of Periodontology 81(6): 819-826, 2010

Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary. European Journal of Oral Implantology 7(3): 267-281, 2014