+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure



Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure



Waste Management 33(12): 2653-2658



In order to investigate the effect of feedstock ratios in biogas production, anaerobic co-digestions of rice straw with kitchen waste and pig manure were carried out. A series of single-stage batch mesophilic (37±1 °C) anaerobic digestions were performed at a substrate concentration of 54 g/L based on volatile solids (VS). The results showed that the optimal ratio of kitchen waste, pig manure, and rice straw was 0.4:1.6:1, for which the C/N ratio was 21.7. The methane content was 45.9-70.0% and rate of VS reduction was 55.8%. The biogas yield of 674.4 L/kg VS was higher than that of the digestion of rice straw or pig manure alone by 71.67% and 10.41%, respectively. Inhibition of biogas production by volatile fatty acids (VFA) occurred when the addition of kitchen waste was greater than 26%. The VFA analysis showed that, in the reactors that successfully produced biogas, the dominant intermediate metabolites were propionate and acetate, while they were lactic acid, acetate, and propionate in the others.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053743177

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23790673

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.014


Related references

Improved biogas production and biodegradation of oilseed rape straw by using kitchen waste and duck droppings as co-substrates in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Plos One 12(8): E0182361, 2017

Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and Water Hyacinth. Renewable Energy 109: 434-439, 2017

High-solid Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste and Rice Straw for Biogas Production. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University 21(4): 61-66, 2014

Simultaneous biogas and biogas slurry production from co-digestion of pig manure and corn straw: Performance optimization and microbial community shift. Bioresource Technology 282: 37-47, 2019

Anaerobic Codigestion of Kitchen Waste with Cattle Manure for Biogas Production. Energy & Fuels 23(4): 2225-2228, 2009

Anaerobic co-digestion of sanitary wastewater and kitchen solid waste for biogas and fertilizer production under ambient temperature: waste generated from condominium house. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 11(2): 509-516, 2014

Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with dairy manure in a two-phase digestion system. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 160(2): 643-654, 2010

Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production. Renewable Energy 78: 527-530, 2015

Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource Technology 101(11): 4021-4028, 2010

Co-digestion of food waste and dairy manure for biogas production. Transactions of the ASABE 50(5): 1815-1821, 2007

Effect of fipronil on biogas production performance during anaerobic digestion of chicken manure and corn straw. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 2019: 1-10, 2019

Screening co-digestion of food waste water with manure for biogas production. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 3(1): 11-19, 2009

Biogas production improvement and C/N control by natural clinoptilolite addition into anaerobic co-digestion of Phragmites australis, feces and kitchen waste. Bioresource Technology 180: 192-199, 2016

Improved biogas production from whole stillage by co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresource Technology 114: 314-319, 2012

Improved biogas production from food waste by co-digestion with de-oiled grease trap waste. Bioresource Technology 201: 237-244, 2016