+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Improving quality measurement for anticoagulation: adding international normalized ratio variability to percent time in therapeutic range



Improving quality measurement for anticoagulation: adding international normalized ratio variability to percent time in therapeutic range



Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 7(5): 664-669



Among patients receiving warfarin, percent time in therapeutic range (TTR) and international normalized ratio (INR) variability predict adverse events individually. Here, we examined what is added to the prediction of adverse events by using both measures together. We included 40 404 patients anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation, aged 65+, within the Veterans Health Administration. TTR and log-transformed INR variability were calculated for each patient. Our study outcomes were ischemic stroke and major bleeding, defined using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes. We estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) for the study outcomes using 3 nested Cox regression models, including (1) TTR or log INR variability separately; (2) TTR and log INR variability together; and (3) both predictors together plus an interaction term. We divided TTR into 3 categories (high, >70%; moderate, 50% to 70%; low, <50%) and log INR variability into 2 categories (stable and unstable). The reference groups high TTR and stable anticoagulation each denote good control. Higher log INR variability (ie, unstable control) predicted ischemic stroke (HR=1.45, P<0.001) and major bleeding (HR=1.57, P<0.001) independently, regardless of TTR levels. Our model with interaction terms showed that High log INR variability predicted a significantly higher risk for ischemic stroke and major bleeding compared with low log INR variability, at moderate TTR levels (HR= 1.27 and HR=1.29, respectively) and at high TTR levels (HR=1.55 and HR=1.56, respectively), but not at low TTR levels. Unstable anticoagulation predicts warfarin adverse effects independent of TTR. Moreover, knowledge about anticoagulation stability further stratifies the risk for adverse events at given levels of TTR.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053755006

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25185245

DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.000804


Related references

Time in Therapeutic Range and Percentage of International Normalized Ratio in the Therapeutic Range as a Measure of Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32(10): 1247.E23-1247.E28, 2016

SAMeTT(2)R(2) does not predict time in therapeutic range of the international normalized ratio in patients attending a high-quality anticoagulation clinic. Chest 145(1): 187-188, 2014

Identifying potential predictors of high-quality oral anticoagulation assessed by time in therapeutic international normalized ratio range: a prospective, long-term, single-center, observational study. Clinical Therapeutics 34(7): 1511-1520, 2012

International Normalized Ratio Variability: A Measure of Anticoagulation Quality or a Powerful Mortality Predictor. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 24(10): 2223-2228, 2016

Clinical predictors of prolonged delay in return of the international normalized ratio to within the therapeutic range after excessive anticoagulation with warfarin. Annals of Internal Medicine 135(6): 393-400, 2001

The optimal range of international normalized ratio for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation during therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 6(2): 302-309, 2013

Risk-adjusted percent time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator for outpatient oral anticoagulation: results of the Veterans Affairs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA). Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 4(1): 22-29, 2011

Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 118(20): 2029-2037, 2008

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): International Normalized Ratio variability of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care testing whole blood prothrombin time monitors. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 88(6): 992-995, 2002

Randomized Comparison of Two Approaches to Initial Warfarin Dosing: Time in Therapeutic Range of International Normalized Ratio During Hospitalization. Kardiologiia 57(9): 42-46, 2017

Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation. Thrombosis Research 113(1): 35-40, 2004

Improving the inter-laboratory harmonization of the international normalized ratio (INR): utilizing the concept of transference to estimate and/or validate international sensitivity index (ISI) and mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) values and/or to eliminate measurement bias. Clinical Laboratory Science 25(1): 13-25, 2012

Anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, and therapeutic international normalized ratio during catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm 6(10): 1430-1431, 2009

Pharmacist-managed international normalized ratio patient self-testing is associated with increased time in therapeutic range in patients with left ventricular assist devices at an academic medical center. Asaio Journal 60(2): 193-198, 2014

Quality of life (QoL) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) control of patients attending anticoagulation clinics. Public Health 129(7): 954-962, 2015