+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Improving the accuracy of livestock distribution estimates through spatial interpolation



Improving the accuracy of livestock distribution estimates through spatial interpolation



Geospatial Health 7(1): 101-109



Animal distribution maps serve many purposes such as estimating transmission risk of zoonotic pathogens to both animals and humans. The reliability and usability of such maps is highly dependent on the quality of the input data. However, decisions on how to perform livestock surveys are often based on previous work without considering possible consequences. A better understanding of the impact of using different sample designs and processing steps on the accuracy of livestock distribution estimates was acquired through iterative experiments using detailed survey. The importance of sample size, sample design and aggregation is demonstrated and spatial interpolation is presented as a potential way to improve cattle number estimates. As expected, results show that an increasing sample size increased the precision of cattle number estimates but these improvements were mainly seen when the initial sample size was relatively low (e.g. a median relative error decrease of 0.04% per sampled parish for sample sizes below 500 parishes). For higher sample sizes, the added value of further increasing the number of samples declined rapidly (e.g. a median relative error decrease of 0.01% per sampled parish for sample sizes above 500 parishes. When a two-stage stratified sample design was applied to yield more evenly distributed samples, accuracy levels were higher for low sample densities and stabilised at lower sample sizes compared to one-stage stratified sampling. Aggregating the resulting cattle number estimates yielded significantly more accurate results because of averaging under- and over-estimates (e.g. when aggregating cattle number estimates from subcounty to district level, P <0.009 based on a sample of 2,077 parishes using one-stage stratified samples). During aggregation, area-weighted mean values were assigned to higher administrative unit levels. However, when this step is preceded by a spatial interpolation to fill in missing values in non-sampled areas, accuracy is improved remarkably. This counts especially for low sample sizes and spatially even distributed samples (e.g. P <0.001 for a sample of 170 parishes using one-stage stratified sampling and aggregation on district level). Whether the same observations apply on a lower spatial scale should be further investigated.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053755894

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23242685

DOI: 10.4081/gh.2012.109


Related references

Accuracy of spatial interpolation between point data on soil moisture supply capacity compared with estimates from mapping units. Geoderma 27(4): 311-326, 1982

Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: accuracy and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere 82(3): 468-476, 2011

Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 31(1): 160-171, 2006

Geo-spatial grid-based transformations of precipitation estimates using spatial interpolation methods. Computers & Geosciences 40, 2012

Improving the accuracy of PGSE DTI experiments using the spatial distribution of b matrix. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 33(3): 286-295, 2015

Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67(5): 1564-1571, 2003

Improving the accuracy of the boundary element method by the use of second-order interpolation functions. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 47(10): 1336-1346, 2000

Improving the precision of length frequency distribution estimates from trawl surveys by including spatial covariance: Using Namibian Merluccius capensis as an example. Fisheries Research 62(1): 7-20, 2003

Influence of interpolation method and sampling number on spatial prediction accuracy of soil Olsen-P. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 20(3): 673-678, 2009

Improving variance estimates for livestock surveys. SRB research report: 89 (89-01), 1989

Improving spatial resolution in skin-contact thermography: comparison between a spline based and linear interpolation. Medical Engineering and Physics 30(6): 733-738, 2008

Does the interpolation accuracy of species distribution models come at the expense of transferability?. Ecography 35(3): 276-288, 2012

Comparison of euphausiid population size estimates obtained using replicated acoustic surveys of coastal inlets and block average vs. geostatistical spatial interpolation methods. Fisheries Oceanography 11(2): 102-115, 2002

Evaluation of interpolation accuracy of neural kriging with application to temperature-distribution analysis. Mathematical Geology: , Pages 421-448. 2001., 2001

Improving Accuracy of Influenza-Associated Hospitalization Rate Estimates. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21(9): 1595-1601, 2015