+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation



Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation



Medical Physics 40(8): 082902



Low-intensity focused ultrasound has been shown to stimulate the brain noninvasively and without noticeable tissue damage. Such a noninvasive and localized neurostimulation is expected to have a major impact in neuroscience in the coming years. This emerging field will require many animal experiments to fully understand the link between ultrasound and stimulation. The primary goal of this paper is to investigate transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation at low frequency (320 kHz) on anesthetized rats for different acoustic pressures and estimate the in situ pressure field distribution and the corresponding motor threshold, if any. The corresponding acoustic pressure distribution inside the brain, which cannot be measured in vivo, is investigated based on numerical simulations of the ultrasound propagation inside the head cavity, reproducing at best the experiments conducted in the first part, both in terms of transducer and head geometry and in terms of acoustic parameters. In this study, 37 ultrasonic neurostimulation sessions were achieved in rats (N=8) using a 320 kHz transducer. The corresponding beam profile in the entire head was simulated in order to investigate the in situ pressure and intensity level as well as the spatial pressure distribution, thanks to a rat microcomputed tomography scan (CT)-based 3D finite differences time domain solver. Ultrasound pulse evoked a motor response in more than 60% of the experimental sessions. In those sessions, the stimulation was always present, repeatable with a pressure threshold under which no motor response occurred. This average acoustic pressure threshold was found to be 0.68±0.1 MPa (corresponding mechanical index, MI=1.2 and spatial peak, pulse averaged intensity, Isppa=7.5 W cm(-2)), as calibrated in free water. A slight variation was observed between deep anesthesia stage (0.77±0.04 MPa) and light anesthesia stage (0.61±0.03 MPa), assessed from the pedal reflex. Several kinds of motor responses were observed: movements of the tail, the hind legs, the forelimbs, the eye, and even a single whisker were induced separately. Numerical simulations of an equivalent experiment with identical acoustic parameters showed that the acoustic field was spread over the whole rat brain with the presence of several secondary pressure peaks. Due to reverberations, a 1.8-fold increase of the spatial peak, temporal peak acoustic pressure (Psptp) (±0.4 standard deviation), a 3.6-fold increase (±1.8) for the spatial peak, temporal peak acoustic intensity (Isptp), and 2.3 for the spatial peak, pulse averaged acoustic intensity (Isppa), were found compared to simulations of the beam in free water. Applying such corrections due to reverberations on the experimental results would yield a higher estimation for the average acoustic pressure threshold for motor neurostimulation at 320 KHz at 1.2±0.3 MPa (MI=2.2±0.5 and Isppa=17.5±7.5 W cm(-2)). Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation is pressure- and anesthesia-dependent in the rat model. Numerical simulations have shown that the acoustic pattern can be complex inside the rat head and that special care must be taken for small animal studies relating acoustic parameters to neurostimulation effects, especially at a low frequency.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053852031

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23927357

DOI: 10.1118/1.4812423


Related references

Influence of surgical metal implants on the distribution of the intensity in the ultrasonic field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 39(12): 756-760, 1958

Multiscale coupling of transcranial direct current stimulation to neuron electrodynamics: modeling the influence of the transcranial electric field on neuronal depolarization. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2014: 360179, 2014

Influence of pressure distribution on flow field temperature reconstruction. Applied Optics 50(15): 2145-2151, 2011

Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new tool for neurostimulation. Revue Neurologique 169(2): 108-120, 2013

Efficacy of neurostimulation to treat symptoms of Mal de Debarquement Syndrome. A preliminary study using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuropsychology 9(2): 336-341, 2015

Manipulation of cells using an ultrasonic pressure field. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 31(6): 857-864, 2005

Complex therapy of suppurative wounds with jet-aerosol ultrasonic treatment and transcutaneous electro-neurostimulation. Sovetskaia Meditsina 1988(7): 99, 1988

Comparison between neurostimulation techniques repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation vs electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of resistant depression: patient preference and cost-effectiveness. Patient Preference and Adherence 10: 1481-1487, 2016

Modelling of the Electric Field Distribution in Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Adolescence, in the Adulthood, and in the Old Age. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2016: 9039613, 2016

Reproduction of pressure field in ultrasonic-measurement-integrated simulation of blood flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 29(7): 726-740, 2013

Influence of gas law on ultrasonic behaviour of porous media under pressure. Ultrasonics 50(7): 641-644, 2010

Ultrasound field distribution and ultrasonic oxidation desulfurization efficiency. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 20(2): 696-702, 2013

Modeling cavitation in a rapidly changing pressure field - application to a small ultrasonic horn. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 22: 482-492, 2015

The influence of air content in water on ultrasonic cavitation field. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21(2): 566-571, 2014

Experimental researches on the influence of various tumors on the ultrasonic field. Acta Ophthalmol 44(2): 253-260, 1966