+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography

Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 67(11): 1415-1425

The purpose of this study was to investigate image quality identification methods among direct- and indirect-type flat panel detectors (FPDs) and a computed radiography (CR) system using two radiation qualities RQA3 and RQA5 defined in the IEC 61267 standard. For each system, the digital characteristic curve, the presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), and the normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) were measured. Images for a burger phantom and a foot-bone phantom were processed by resolution identification utilizing two-dimensional Fourier transform, and then contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each image was measured. For the RQA3, the direct FPD system indicated the highest DQE value, and for the RQA5 DQE value of indirect FPD system, it was a little higher than that of direct FPD system. The CNR results with the resolution identification displayed good accordance with the DQE results in both phantoms. From the DQE results, dose ratios for image quality identification were determined, and the CNRs of the dose-adjusted images were measured. The results for, the CNRs of all systems showed good coincidence. From these findings, they indicated that the DQE measurement is effective to determine the exposure parameters for equalizing the image quality of different types of radiographic systems.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 053968104

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22104233

Related references

A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement. Medical Physics 31(1): 98-110, 2004

Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies. Investigative Radiology 37(11): 609-614, 2002

Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector. Acta Radiologica. Supplementum 43(427): 1-43, 2002

Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 181(1): 171-176, 2003

Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an indirect small-field CCD technique using a high-contrast phantom. International Journal of Breast Cancer 2011: 701054, 2012

Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Medical Physics 30(7): 1747-1757, 2003

Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality. Radiology 235(2): 642-650, 2005

Assessment of clinical image quality in feline chest radiography with a needle-image plate (NIP) storage phosphor system--an approach to the evaluation of image quality in neonatal radiography. Rofo 182(2): 122-132, 2010

Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration. Radiology 237(2): 691-700, 2005

Improved image quality utilizing dual plate computed radiography. British Journal of Radiology 68(806): 182-188, 1995

Comparison of the image quality of a storage phospor system and a flat-panel detector in feline thoracic radiography. Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe K, Kleintiere/Heimtiere 38(6): 355-366, 2010

Routine skeleton radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality and clinical acceptance at 50% dose reduction. Investigative Radiology 38(4): 230-235, 2003

Image quality and effective dose of a robotic flat panel 3D C-arm vs computed tomography. International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery 12(4): 743-750, 2015

Investigating the exposure class of a computed radiography system for optimisation of physical image quality for chest radiography. British Journal of Radiology 82(981): 705-710, 2009

Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system. British Journal of Radiology 86(1027): 20130077, 2013