+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Is the Non-rivalrousness of Intellectual Objects a Problem for the Moral Justification of Economic Rights to Intellectual Property?



Is the Non-rivalrousness of Intellectual Objects a Problem for the Moral Justification of Economic Rights to Intellectual Property?



Science and Engineering Ethics 21(4): 895-906



It is often argued that the fact that intellectual objects-objects like ideas, inventions, concepts, and melodies-can be used by several people simultaneously makes intellectual property rights impossible or particularly difficult to morally justify. In this article, I assess the line of criticism of intellectual ownership in connection with a central category of intellectual property rights, economic rights to intellectual property. I maintain that it is unconvincing.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053999421

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24996913

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9574-4


Related references

An autonomy-based justification for intellectual property rights of indigenous communities. Environmental Ethics 21(2): 177-190, Summer, 1999

Intellectual property rights, moral imagination, and access to life-enhancing drugs. Business Ethics Quarterly 15(4): 595-613, 2005

Public healthoriented intellectual property and trade policies in Africa and the regional mechanism under Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights amendment. Public Health 173: 1-4, 2019

China's intellectual property protection strength and its evaluation - based on the accession to TRIPS Agreement (Agreement On Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). R&d Management 45(4): 397-410, 2015

Language revitalization in Native North America--issues of intellectual property rights and intellectual sovereignty. Collegium Antropologicum 28(Suppl. 1): 257-262, 2004

Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics 10(4): 700-719, 2006

Intellectual property rights and economic development. World Bank Discussion Papers ( 412): ix + 57 pp., 2000

Intellectual property rights and biodiversity: the economic myths. Perspectivas Rurales 3(1): 14-36, 1999

Das deutsche Arzneimittelpatent eine moralische Bewertung; Intellectual property rights on pharmaceuticals in Germanya moral evaluation;. Ethik in der Medizin 29(4): 273-288, 2017

Intellectual property rights in science, technology, and economic performance. 1990

Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation. World Development 46: 66-78, 2013

The economic impact of novel genes in plant biotechnology: not without strong intellectual property rights. Conservation of plant genes: DNA banking and in vitro biotechnology: 45-67, 1992

Intellectual Property Rights, FDI, R&D and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis. World Economy 39(7): 983-1004, 2016

Economic impact assessment of intellectual property rights regulation: the case of Egypt. Agricultural biotechnology and intellectual property: seeds of change: 281-292, 2007

Agriculture and intellectual property rights: Economic, institutional and implementation issues in biotechnology. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28(1): 85-88, 2001