+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study



Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study



Annals of Surgical Oncology 17(1): 271-278



The paucity of long-term oncologic results published in the literature still prevents the scientific community from cementing the place of laparoscopy as the procedure of choice for managing endometrial cancer. We present the outcomes of consecutive patients with endometrial cancer managed laparoscopically with >3-year follow-up. Data from 117 consecutive women undergoing surgery for treatment of a clinical stage I endometrial cancer and who achieved at least 3-year follow-up were prospectively analyzed. These cases were compared with a historical cohort of 122 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who had undergone surgery through laparotomy. The laparoscopy and laparotomy groups were similar with regard to baseline patient characteristics, surgical stage, proportion of tumors with unfavorable histology and high grade, as well as patterns of adjuvant therapy. The median (range) follow-up of surviving patients was 52 (36-84) months in the laparoscopic cohort and 80 (36-151) months in the laparotomy cohort. Women who underwent laparoscopy and those who underwent laparotomy had similar 3-year recurrence-free survival rates (91.4% vs. 88.5%, P = 0.52), as well as similar 3-year overall survival rates (94.0% vs. 93.4%, P = 1.0). Multivariate analysis showed that advanced surgical stage, unfavorable histology, and patient age >65 years significantly affect survival, regardless of the surgical approach used. Cancer control in women with endometrial cancer does not appear to be worsened by laparoscopic surgery. In the absence of level I evidence to establish long-term recurrence and survival equivalence, analysis of series as they mature is crucial to fully evaluate disease control afforded by laparoscopy.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054074835

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19826876

DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0720-1


Related references

Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. European Spine Journal 12(6): 613-617, 2003

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surgical Oncology 22(3): E39-E43, 2013

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 3-year follow-up outcomes. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 31(4): 805-811, 2016

Recurrence rates at minimum five-year follow-up: laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica 51(2): 45-47, 2004

Recurrence rates at minimum 5-year follow-up: laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 13(5): 325-327, 2003

Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology 107(6): 653-658, 2013

Open colectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted colectomy supported by hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy for resectable colorectal cancer: a comparative study with minimum follow-up of three years. Hepato-Gastroenterology56(93):998, 2009

Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years. Hepato-Gastroenterology 49(47): 1185-1190, 2002

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surgical Endoscopy 20(4): 546-553, 2006

Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. Gynecologic Oncology 139(2): 300-305, 2015

Total laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage 1 endometrial cancer: the LACE randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials 27(4): 353-363, 2006

A Prospective Comparative Study of Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Arthroscopy 33(2): 269-277, 2017

Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 31(6): 2607-2615, 2017

The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: A multicenter study. Surgery 157(6): 1046-1054, 2015

Differences in Epidural and Analgesic Use in Patients with Apparent Stage I Endometrial Cancer Treated by Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Results from the Randomised LACE Trial. Minimally Invasive Surgery 2013: 764329, 2013