+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Laser range scanning for image-guided neurosurgery: investigation of image-to-physical space registrations

Laser range scanning for image-guided neurosurgery: investigation of image-to-physical space registrations

Medical Physics 35(4): 1593-1605

In this article a comprehensive set of registration methods is utilized to provide image-to-physical space registration for image-guided neurosurgery in a clinical study. Central to all methods is the use of textured point clouds as provided by laser range scanning technology. The objective is to perform a systematic comparison of registration methods that include both extracranial (skin marker point-based registration (PBR), and face-based surface registration) and intracranial methods (feature PBR, cortical vessel-contour registration, a combined geometry/intensity surface registration method, and a constrained form of that method to improve robustness). The platform facilitates the selection of discrete soft-tissue landmarks that appear on the patient's intraoperative cortical surface and the preoperative gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) image volume, i.e., true corresponding novel targets. In an 11 patient study, data were taken to allow statistical comparison among registration methods within the context of registration error. The results indicate that intraoperative face-based surface registration is statistically equivalent to traditional skin marker registration. The four intracranial registration methods were investigated and the results demonstrated a target registration error of 1.6 +/- 0.5 mm, 1.7 +/- 0.5 mm, 3.9 +/- 3.4 mm, and 2.0 +/- 0.9 mm, for feature PBR, cortical vessel-contour registration, unconstrained geometric/intensity registration, and constrained geometric/intensity registration, respectively. When analyzing the results on a per case basis, the constrained geometric/intensity registration performed best, followed by feature PBR, and finally cortical vessel-contour registration. Interestingly, the best target registration errors are similar to targeting errors reported using bone-implanted markers within the context of rigid targets. The experience in this study as with others is that brain shift can compromise extracranial registration methods from the earliest stages. Based on the results reported here, organ-based approaches to registration would improve this, especially for shallow lesions.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054081958

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18491553

DOI: 10.1118/1.2870216

Related references

Cortical surface registration for image-guided neurosurgery using laser-range scanning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22(8): 973-985, 2003

Feasibility study for image-guided kidney surgery: assessment of required intraoperative surface for accurate physical to image space registrations. Medical Physics 35(9): 4251-4261, 2008

3D laser scanning for image guided stereotactic neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement 64: 45-48, 1995

Interactive image guided laser techniques in neurosurgery. Lasers in Surgery & Medicine (SUPPL 4): 63, 1992

An interactive image guided localizing arm for guidance of laser neurosurgery. Lasers in Surgery & Medicine (SUPPL 2): 30, 1990

A novel augmented reality system of image projection for image-guided neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica 155(5): 943-947, 2013

A new robust markerless method for automatic image-to-patient registration in image-guided neurosurgery system. Computer Assisted Surgery 22(Sup1): 319-325, 2017

Stereovision to MR image registration for cortical surface displacement mapping to enhance image-guided neurosurgery. Medical Physics 41(10): 102302-102302, 2015

Mutual-information-based image to patient re-registration using intraoperative ultrasound in image-guided neurosurgery. Medical Physics 35(10): 4612-4624, 2008

Multi-modality image fusion for image-guided neurosurgery. Lemke, H U, Vannier, M W, Inamura, K, Farman, A G International Congress Series; Computer assisted radiology and surgery 681-685, 1999

Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods. Journal of Neurosurgery 106(6): 1012-1016, 2007

Multimodal image re-registration via mutual information to account for initial tissue motion during image-guided neurosurgery. Conference Proceedings 3: 1675-1678, 2007

A novel high dynamic range image enhancement algorithm based on guided image filter. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 126(23): 4581-4585, 2015

Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery. Neurosurgery 50(4): 797-801; Discussion 802-3, 2002

Fabrication of multifaceted, micropatterned surfaces and image-guided patterning using laser scanning lithography. Methods in Cell Biology 119: 193-217, 2014