+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids



Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids



Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 25(9): 791-803



Several studies have demonstrated negative effects of directional microphone configurations on left-right and front-back (FB) sound localization. New processing schemes, such as frequency-dependent directionality and front focus with wireless ear-to-ear communication in recent, commercial hearing aids may preserve the binaural cues necessary for left-right localization and may introduce useful spectral cues necessary for FB disambiguation. In this study, two hearing aids with different processing schemes, which were both designed to preserve the ability to localize sounds in the horizontal plane (left-right and FB), were compared. We compared horizontal (left-right and FB) sound localization performance of hearing aid users fitted with two types of behind-the-ear (BTE) devices. The first type of BTE device had four different programs that provided (1) no directionality, (2-3) symmetric frequency-dependent directionality, and (4) an asymmetric configuration. The second pair of BTE devices was evaluated in its omnidirectional setting. This setting automatically activates a soft forward-oriented directional scheme that mimics the pinna effect. Also, wireless communication between the hearing aids was present in this configuration (5). A broadband stimulus was used as a target signal. The directional hearing abilities of the listeners were also evaluated without hearing aids as a reference. A total of 12 listeners with moderate to severe hearing loss participated in this study. All were experienced hearing-aid users. As a reference, 11 listeners with normal hearing participated. The participants were positioned in a 13-speaker array (left-right, -90°/+90°) or 7-speaker array (FB, 0-180°) and were asked to report the number of the loudspeaker located the closest to where the sound was perceived. The root mean square error was calculated for the left-right experiment, and the percentage of FB errors was used as a FB performance measure. RESULTS were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. For the left-right localization task, no significant differences could be proven between the unaided condition and both partial directional schemes and the omnidirectional scheme. The soft forward-oriented system and the asymmetric system did show a detrimental effect compared with the unaided condition. On average, localization was worst when users used the asymmetric condition. Analysis of the results of the FB experiment showed good performance, similar to unaided, with both the partial directional systems and the asymmetric configuration. Significantly worse performance was found with the omnidirectional and the omnidirectional soft forward-oriented BTE systems compared with the other hearing-aid systems. Bilaterally fitted partial directional systems preserve (part of) the binaural cues necessary for left-right localization and introduce, preserve, or enhance useful spectral cues that allow FB disambiguation. Omnidirectional systems, although good for left-right localization, do not provide the user with enough spectral information for an optimal FB localization performance.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054099618

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25405835

DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.25.9.2


Related references

The effects of various front-to-back ratios on the performance of directional microphone hearing aids. Journal of the American Auditory Society 5(1): 30-34, 1979

A Comparison Between Hearing Aids with Directional Microphone and Hearing Aids with Conventional Microphone. Scandinavian Audiology 2(3): 173-176, 1973

Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15(5): 353-364, 2004

The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27(7): 588-600, 2016

Effects of Binaural Spatialization in Wireless Microphone Systems for Hearing Aids on Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216517753548, 2018

Some experiments with hearing aids with directional microphone. Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum 1978(Suppl 8): 216-222, 1978

Making sense of directional microphone hearing aids. American Journal of Audiology 8(2): 117-127, 1999

Real-World Performance of Directional Microphone Hearing Aids. Seminars in Hearing 26(02): 70-77, 2005

Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 46(5): 603-618, 2009

Simulation of fixed microphone arrays for directional hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100(2 Pt 1): 848-856, 1996

The development of a biologically-inspired directional microphone for hearing aids. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 11(2): 86-94, 2006

Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13(6): 295-307, 2002

Signal-to-noise ratio loss and directional-microphone hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing 21(2): 179-200, 2000

Efficacy of directional microphone hearing aids: a meta-analytic perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12(4): 202-214, 2001

Directional Microphone Hearing Aids in School Environments: Working Toward Optimization. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 60(1): 263-275, 2017