+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements



Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements



Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(2): 179-188



Many words in the English language contain semantically and morphologically unrelated smaller words (e.g., room in groom). Recent findings indicate that a high frequency embedded word produces interference during visual word identification (e.g., Bowers, Davis, & Hanley, 2005; Davis, Perea, & Acha, 2009; Davis & Taft, 2005). In an eye movement experiment we examined whether lexical embeddings produce interference even when explicit judgments about lexicality or category membership are not solicited. Participants silently read sentences that each contained a target word with a lexical embedding. Fixation times were longer on target words that contained a higher frequency embedding compared to those that contained a lower frequency embedding. This finding indicates that a high frequency embedding interferes with word identification during silent reading and adds to a growing body of evidence that a word's orthographic neighborhood includes embedded words.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054118969

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22900139

DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.604028


Related references

Lexical representation and processing of morphologically complex words: evidence from the reading performance of an Italian agrammatic patient. Brain and Language 79(3): 345-359, 2002

An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46(2): 281-294, 2016

The time course of lexical access in morphologically complex words. Neuroreport 21(5): 319-323, 2010

Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia 32(1): 105-124, 1994

Italian speakers learn lexical stress of German morphologically complex words. Speech Communication 51(10): 933-947, 2009

Unsupervised Low-Dimensional Vector Representations for Words, Phrases and Text that are Transparent, Scalable, and produce Similarity Metrics that are not Redundant with Neural Embeddings. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019: 103096-103096, 2019

Evidence for a differential interference of noise in sub-lexical and lexical reading routes in healthy participants and dyslexics. Cognitive Neuropsychology 34(1-2): 42-51, 2017

More words in the neighborhood: interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12(5): 904-910, 2006

Lexical interference in semantic processing of simple words: Implications for brand names. Psychology and Marketing 22(1): 51-69, 2005

Independent distractor frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in picture-word interference: fMRI evidence for post-lexical and lexical accounts according to distractor type. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(2): 482-495, 2012

Inflected words in production: Evidence for a morphologically rich lexicon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69(3): 432-454, 2017

Prosody in parsing morphologically complex words: neurophysiological evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31(1-2): 147-163, 2014

Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision. Cognitive Processing 15(2): 209-215, 2014

Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 1148: 123-137, 2007

Lexical access of resyllabified words: evidence from phoneme monitoring. Memory and Cognition 27(3): 413-421, 1999