+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Living donor nephrectomy: open versus laparoscopic technique



Living donor nephrectomy: open versus laparoscopic technique



Urologia 76(1): 36-40



The living donor nephrectomy has to be safe and effective, allowing a good graft function in the recipient. In the past, donor nephrectomy was performed only by open technique; more recently this nephrectomy has also been performed by laparoscopic technique. The best technique has not been established in literature. The purpose of this study is to report the results of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 1992 to August 2008, 37 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 23 nephrectomies were achieved by laparoscopic procedure (LDN) and 14 by open technique (ODN). The 2 groups were comparable regarding both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS. All laparoscopic nephrectomies were successfully performed without conversion to open procedure. No donor deaths were reported in either groups. 3 complications (13%) in the LDN group and 1 (7.1%) in the ODN group (p=0.6) were observed. Mean operative time was higher in the LDN group (p<0.036). Mean warm and cold ischemia time, resumption of oral intake and hospital stay were shorter in the LDN group (p<0.04)( p<0.03) (p<0.0001), whereas the return to normal occupational life was similar (p<0.52). We had no significant differences in the surgical complication rates, graft and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS. Our experience suggests that both procedures can be used safely and efficiently, and assure a good renal function in the recipient. Laparoscopic nephrectomy, although more difficult, provides post-operative advantages. However, laparoscopic procedure must be performed by experienced centres only to prevent serious complications in the donor.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 054148263

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21086327


Related references

Living Donor Nephrectomy: Open versus Laparoscopic Technique. Urologia Journal 76(1): 36-40, 2009

Ischemia-reperfusion syndrome and role of preservation graft technique after laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in a experimental model of living donor kidney transplant. Actas Urologicas Espanolas 32(1): 119-127, 2008

Health-related quality of life after living donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy. Transplantation 91(4): 457-461, 2011

Outcomes of pediatric living donor renal transplant after laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 34(8): 3097-3098, 2002

A meta-analysis of mini-open versus standard open and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplant International 22(4): 463-474, 2009

Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 79(9): 1236-1240, 2005

Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68(4): 497-502, 1999

Cost effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 87(6): 831-838, 2009

Long-Term Donor Outcomes after Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Living Donor Nephrectomy: Focus on Pregnancy Rates, Hypertension and Quality of Life. Urologia Internationalis 97(4): 450-456, 2016

Patient-reported outcomes for open versus laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Progress in Transplantation 16(2): 162-169, 2006

Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the traditional open technique. International Braz J Urol 28(5): 394-401; Discussion 401-2, 2005

Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy. Urologia Internationalis 84(1): 61-66, 2010

Quality of life after randomization to laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: long-term follow-up. Transplantation 84(1): 64-69, 2007

Determining the Superior Technique for Living-donor Nephrectomy: the Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Versus the Retroperitoneoscopic Approach. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation 14(2): 129-138, 2016

A controlled sequential evaluation of open donor nephrectomy versus classical and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: an update. Transplantation Proceedings 37(7): 2944-2946, 2005