+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion



Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion



Journal of Vision 8(12): 1.1-123



We demonstrate that, as an object moves, color and motion signals from successive, widely spaced locations are integrated, but letter and digit shapes are not. The features that integrate as an object moves match those that integrate when the eyes move but the object is stationary (spatiotopic integration). We suggest that this integration is mediated by large receptive fields gated by attention and that it occurs for surface features (motion and color) that can be summed without precise alignment but not shape features (letters or digits) that require such alignment. Rapidly alternating pairs of colors and motions were presented at several locations around a circle centered at fixation. The same two stimuli alternated at each location with the phase of the alternation reversing from one location to the next. When observers attended to only one location, the stimuli alternated in both retinal coordinates and in the attended stream: feature identification was poor. When the observer's attention shifted around the circle in synchrony with the alternation, the stimuli still alternated at each location in retinal coordinates, but now attention always selected the same color and motion, with the stimulus appearing as a single unchanging object stepping across the locations. The maximum presentation rate at which the color and motion could be reported was twice that for stationary attention, suggesting (as control experiments confirmed) object-based integration of these features. In contrast, the identification of a letter or digit alternating with a mask showed no advantage for moving attention despite the fact that moving attention accessed (within the limits of precision for attentional selection) only the target and never the mask. The masking apparently leaves partial information that cannot be integrated across locations, and we speculate that for spatially defined patterns like letters, integration across large shifts in location may be limited by problems in aligning successive samples. Our results also suggest that as attention moves, the selection of any given location (dwell time) can be as short as 50 ms, far shorter than the typical dwell time for stationary attention. Moving attention can therefore sample a brief instant of a rapidly changing stream if it passes quickly through, giving access to events that are otherwise not seen.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054408334

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18831615

DOI: 10.1167/8.12.1


Related references

Infant use of relative motion as information for form: Evidence for spatiotemporal integration of complex motion displays. Perception and Psychophysics 53(2): 190-199, 1993

Spatiotemporal motion boundary detection and motion boundary velocity estimation for tracking moving objects with a moving camera: a level sets PDEs approach with concurrent camera motion compensation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(11): 1473-1490, 2004

The neural representation of objects formed through the spatiotemporal integration of visual transients. Neuroimage 142: 67-78, 2016

Robust shape perception of static and rotating objects revealed by spatiotemporal form integration. 2013

Spatiotemporal integration in the detection of coherent motion. Vision Research 24(1): 47-53, 1984

Spatial integration of motion information in spatiotemporal interpolation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 35(4): 2008, 1994

Spatiotemporal Form Integration: sequentially presented inducers can lead to representations of stationary and rigidly rotating objects. Attention Perception and Psychophysics 77(8): 2740-2754, 2015

The neural correlates of spatiotemporal form integration in object and motion perception. 2012

MT Motion integration can be explained by the spatiotemporal frequency content of V1 surround suppression. 2013

The effects of spatiotemporal integration on maximum displacement thresholds for the detection of coherent motion. Vision Research 35(16): 2287-2302, 1995

Recovering metric properties of objects through spatiotemporal interpolation. Vision Research 102: 80-88, 2014

Spatiotemporal neural integration for bistable perception in a response-time structure-from-motion task. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 56(12): 2937-2948, 2009

Motion integration for ocular pursuit does not hinder perceptual segregation of moving objects. Journal of Neuroscience 34(17): 5835-5841, 2014

Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects. Journal of Neurophysiology 116(4): 1592-1602, 2016