+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Motion integration for ocular pursuit does not hinder perceptual segregation of moving objects

Motion integration for ocular pursuit does not hinder perceptual segregation of moving objects

Journal of Neuroscience 34(17): 5835-5841

When confronted with a complex moving stimulus, the brain can integrate local element velocities to obtain a single motion signal, or segregate the elements to maintain awareness of their identities. The integrated motion signal can drive smooth-pursuit eye movements (Heinen and Watamaniuk, 1998), whereas the segregated signal guides attentive tracking of individual elements in multiple-object tracking tasks (MOT; Pylyshyn and Storm, 1988). It is evident that these processes can occur simultaneously, because we can effortlessly pursue ambulating creatures while inspecting disjoint moving features, such as arms and legs, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, we provide evidence that separate neural circuits perform the mathematically opposed operations of integration and segregation, by demonstrating with a dual-task paradigm that the two processes do not share attentional resources. Human observers attentively tracked a subset of target elements composing a small MOT stimulus, while pursuing it ocularly as it translated across a computer display. Integration of the multidot stimulus yielded optimal pursuit. Importantly, performing MOT while pursuing the stimulus did not degrade performance on either task compared with when each was performed alone, indicating that they did not share attention. A control experiment showed that pursuit was not driven by integration of only the nontargets, leaving the MOT targets free for segregation. Nor was a predictive strategy used to pursue the stimulus, because sudden changes in its global velocity were accurately followed. The results suggest that separate neural mechanisms can simultaneously segregate and integrate the same motion signals.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054474498

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24760843

DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4867-13.2014

Related references

Motion integration for pursuit does not hinder attentive motion segregation. 2013

Stereoscopic acuity in ocular pursuit of moving objects. Documenta Ophthalmologica 78(1-2): 7-128, 1991

Study of visual acuity during the ocular pursuit of moving test objects. I. Introduction. Journal of the Optical Society of America 48(11): 799-802, 1958

Different time scales of motion integration for anticipatory smooth pursuit and perceptual adaptation. Journal of Vision 15(2): -, 2015

Stereoscopic acuity in ocular pursuit of moving objects. Dynamic stereoscopy and movement parallax: relevance to road safety and occupational medicine. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 78(1-2): 1-133, 1991

Ocular pursuit and the estimation of time-to-contact with accelerating objects in prediction motion are controlled independently based on first-order estimates. Experimental Brain Research 202(2): 327-339, 2010

Study of visual acuity during the ocular pursuit of moving test objects II Effects of direction of movement, relative movement, and illumination. josa/48/11/josa-48-11-803.pdf 48(11): 803-0, 1958

Spatiotemporal motion boundary detection and motion boundary velocity estimation for tracking moving objects with a moving camera: a level sets PDEs approach with concurrent camera motion compensation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(11): 1473-1490, 2004

Gaze pursuit of predictable and unpredictable moving visual targets compared to smooth pursuit and vestibulo ocular reflex cancellation. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 16(1): 903, 1990

A model of human ocular pursuit Integration of smooth pursuit and saccades. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 18(1-2): 28, 1992

Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vision Research 14(11): 1059-1069, 1974

The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed?. Perception 29(6): 675-692, 2000

View combination in moving objects: the role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons. Vision Research 49(6): 594-607, 2010

Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit. Experimental Brain Research 233(1): 253-261, 2015

Adaptation in motion perception alteration of motion evoked by ocular pursuit. Perception & Psychophysics 31(3): 251-255, 1982