+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience?



Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience?



Journal of Environmental Management 128: 699-717



Maintaining or enhancing the productive capacity and resilience of rangeland ecosystems is critical for the continued support of people who depend on them for their livelihoods, especially in the face of climatic change. This is also necessary for the continued delivery of ecosystem services derived from rangelands for the broader benefit of societies around the world. Multi-paddock grazing management has been recommended since the mid-20th century as an important tool to adaptively manage rangelands ecosystems to sustain productivity and improve animal management. Moreover, there is much anecdotal evidence from producers that, if applied appropriately, multi-paddock grazing can improve forage and livestock production. By contrast, recent reviews of published rangeland-based grazing systems studies have concluded that, in general, field trials show no superiority of vegetation or animal production in multi-paddock grazing relative to continuous yearlong stocking of single-paddock livestock production systems. Our goal is to provide a framework for rangeland management decisions that support the productivity and resiliency of rangelands and then to identify why different perceptions exist among rangeland managers who have effectively used multi-paddock grazing systems and research scientists who have studied them. First, we discuss the ecology of grazed ecosystems under free-ranging herbivores and under single-paddock fenced conditions. Second, we identify five principles underpinning the adaptive management actions used by successful grazing managers and the ecological, physiological, and behavioral framework they use to achieve desired conservation, production, and financial goals. Third, we examine adaptive management principles needed to successfully manage rangelands subjected to varying environmental conditions. Fourth, we describe the differences between the interpretation of results of grazing systems research reported in the scientific literature and the results reported by successful grazing managers; we highlight the shortcomings of most of the previously conducted grazing systems research for providing information relevant for rangeland managers who aim to achieve desired environmental and economic goals. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and present testable hypotheses to broaden our understanding of how planned multi-paddock grazing management can be used at the ranching enterprise scale to facilitate the adaptive management of rangelands under dynamic environmental conditions.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054484640

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23850765

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064


Related references

AgriLife research Multi-paddock grazing is superior to continuous grazing. 2011

Previous Awassi grazing on a paddock or grazing in the same or adjoining paddock, does not cause fibre contamination of fleeces of Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40(3): 379-385, 2000

Trials of multi paddock grazing systems on veld part 3 a comparison of 6 grazing procedures at 2 stocking rates. Rhodesian Journal of Agricultural Research 15(2): 129-142, 1977

Are multi-paddock grazing systems economically justifiable?. Journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa 8(1): 29-34, 1991

Optimal grazing of a multi-paddock system using a discrete time model. Agricultural systems8(2): 119-139, 1995

Beef cattle performance and forage characteristics of continuous, 6-paddock, and 11-paddock grazing systems. Journal of Animal Science 71(6): 1381-1389, 1993

Assessing optimal configurations of multi-paddock grazing strategies in tallgrass prairie using a simulation model. Journal of Environmental Management 150: 262-273, 2015

Why should a rancher burn northern rangelands?. Beef cattle science handbook1(21): 641-645, 1987

Evaluating the ranch and watershed scale impacts of using traditional and adaptive multi-paddock grazing on runoff, sediment and nutrient losses in North Texas, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 240: 32-44, 2017

Trials of multi paddock grazing systems on veld part 1 an exploratory trial of systems involving 12 paddocks and 1 herd. Rhodesian Journal of Agricultural Research 15(1): 11-23, 1977

Multi-functionality of Mediterranean herbaceous rangelands in Israel a comprehensive pastoral/grazing system approach. Multifunctional Grasslands In A Changing World, Volume Ii: Xxi International Grassland Congress And Viii International Rangeland Congress, Hohhot, China, 29 E 5 Y: 8, 2008

A note on paddock grazing compared with strip grazing for dairy cows. A note on paddock grazing compared with strip grazing for dairy cows: 13, .

A rotational grazing system for milk production with C. dactylon. II. Effect of grazing time on each paddock. Pastos y Forrajes 8(2): 279-295, 1985

Attempted transmission of Brucella ovis between red deer stags by successive grazing or adjacent-paddock grazing. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 48(5): 125-128, 2005

Strip grazing versus paddock grazing under tropical conditions. Jour Brit Grassland Soc 18(1): 69-73, 1963