+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Negative- versus positive-pressure ventilation in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome



Negative- versus positive-pressure ventilation in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome



Critical Care 16(2): R37



Recent experimental data suggest that continuous external negative-pressure ventilation (CENPV) results in better oxygenation and less lung injury than continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV). The effects of CENPV on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain unknown. We compared 2 h CENPV in a tankrespirator ("iron lung") with 2 h CPPV. The six intubated patients developed ARDS after pulmonary thrombectomy (n = 1), aspiration (n = 3), sepsis (n = 1) or both (n = 1). We used a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and matched lung volumes at end expiration. Haemodynamics were assessed using the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) system, and pressure measurements were referenced to atmospheric pressure. CENPV resulted in better oxygenation compared to CPPV (median ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen of 345 mmHg (minimum-maximum 183 to 438 mmHg) vs 256 mmHg (minimum-maximum 123 to 419 mmHg) (P < 0.05). Tank pressures were -32.5 cmH2O (minimum-maximum -30 to -43) at end inspiration and -15 cmH2O (minimum-maximum -15 to -19 cmH2O) at end expiration. NO Inspiratory transpulmonary pressures decreased (P = 0.04) and airway pressures were considerably lower at inspiration (-1.5 cmH2O (minimum-maximum -3 to 0 cmH2O) vs 34.5 cmH2O (minimum-maximum 30 to 47 cmH2O), P = 0.03) and expiration (4.5 cmH2O (minimum-maximum 2 to 5) vs 16 cmH2O (minimum-maximum 16 to 23), P =0.03). During CENPV, intraabdominal pressures decreased from 20.5 mmHg (12 to 30 mmHg) to 1 mmHg (minimum-maximum -7 to 5 mmHg) (P = 0.03). Arterial pressures decreased by approximately 10 mmHg and central venous pressures by 18 mmHg. Intrathoracic blood volume indices and cardiac indices increased at the initiation of CENPV by 15% and 20% (P < 0.05), respectively. Heart rate and extravascular lung water indices remained unchanged. CENPV with a tank respirator improved gas exchange in patients with ARDS at lower transpulmonary, airway and intraabdominal pressures and, at least initially improving haemodynamics. Our observations encourage the consideration of further studies on the physiological effects and the clinical effectiveness of CENPV in patients with ARDS.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054564857

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22386062

DOI: 10.1186/cc11216


Related references

Biphasic Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation versus Conventional Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Lung Injury. 2012

The impact of spontaneous ventilation on distribution of lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation versus pressure support ventilation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 109(6): 1892-1900, 2009

Use of dynamic CT in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with comparison of positive and negative pressure ventilation. European Radiology 19(1): 50-57, 2009

Idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS): intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) versus continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPPV), a comparative study. Padiatrie und Padologie 12(2): 118-126, 1977

Effects of inverse ratio ventilation versus positive end-expiratory pressure on gas exchange and gastric intramucosal PCO(2) and pH under constant mean airway pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 95(5): 1182-1188, 2001

Weaning from mechanical ventilation by long-term nasal positive pressure ventilation in two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pneumococcal sepsis. Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases 69(5): 464-467, 2002

Early Identification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Absence of Positive Pressure Ventilation: Implications for Revision of the Berlin Criteria for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Critical Care Medicine 46(4): 540-546, 2018

Comparison of assisted ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure with intermittent mandatory ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure in adult respiratory distress syndrome patients. American Review of Respiratory Disease 117(4 Part 2): 129, 1978

Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pancreas 45(1): 58-63, 2016

Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatrica 98(9): 1412-1415, 2009

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 21(10): 613-616, 2009

Randomised trial of patient triggered ventilation versus high frequency positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory distress. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 19(5): 379-384, 1991

Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 29(10): 1546-1551, 2016

Higher Versus Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Survey of Anesthesiology 54(5): 215-216, 2010

The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation combined with low tidal volume on prognosis of patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a Meta-analysis. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 23(1): 5-9, 2011