EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Neurometabolic coupling differs for suppression within and beyond the classical receptive field in visual cortex






Journal of Physiology 589(Pt 13): 3175-3190

Neurometabolic coupling differs for suppression within and beyond the classical receptive field in visual cortex

Neurons in visual cortex exhibit two major types of stimulus elicited suppression. One, cross-orientation suppression, occurs within the classical receptive field (CRF) when an orthogonal grating is superposed on one at optimal orientation. The second, surround suppression, occurs when the size of an optimally oriented grating extends beyond the CRF. Previous proposals suggest that intracortical inhibition is responsible for surround suppression whereas feedforward processes may underlie cross-orientation suppression. To gain more insight concerning these types of suppression, we have included measurements of metabolic function in addition to neural responses. We made co-localized measurements of multiple unit neural activity and tissue oxygen concentrations in the striate cortex of anaesthetized cats while using visual stimuli to activate the two kinds of suppression. Results show that the amplitude of the initial negative oxygen response increases with stimulus size but neural responses decrease as size extends beyond the CRF. This shows that oxygen consumption increases with stimulus size regardless of reduced neural response. On the other hand, amplitudes of both the initial negative oxygen component and the neural responses are simultaneously attenuated by the orthogonal mask in cross-orientation suppression. These different neurometabolic response patterns are consistent with suggestions that the two types of suppressive processes arise from different neural mechanisms.


Accession: 054585278

PMID: 21558164

DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205039



Related references

Walker, G.A.; Ohzawa, I.; Freeman, R.D., 1999: Asymmeytric suppression outside the classical receptive field of the visual cortex. Areas beyond the classical receptive field (CRF) can modulate responses of the majority of cells in the primary visual cortex of the cat (Walker et a., 1999). Although general characteristics of this phenomenon have been reported previously, littl...

Walker, G.A.; Ohzawa, I.; Freeman, R.D., 1999: Asymmetric suppression outside the classical receptive field of the visual cortex. Areas beyond the classical receptive field (CRF) can modulate responses of the majority of cells in the primary visual cortex of the cat (). Although general characteristics of this phenomenon have been reported previously, little is known about t...

Chen, K.; Song, X-Mei.; Li, C-Yi., 2013: Contrast-dependent variations in the excitatory classical receptive field and suppressive nonclassical receptive field of cat primary visual cortex. In area V1 of cat and monkey, there is a surround region beyond the classical receptive field (CRF) which alone is unresponsive but may modulate the cell's response. This field is referred to as the "nonclassical receptive field" (n...

Freeman, R.D.; Ohzawa, I.; Walker, G., 2001: Beyond the classical receptive field in the visual cortex. We have investigated the organization of regions outside the classical receptive field (CRF) for neurons in the visual cortex. First, we have determined the incidence and nature of interactions from outside the CRF. We find interaction from region...

Webb, B.S.; Tinsley, C.J.; Barraclough, N.E.; Parker, A.; Derrington, A.M., 2003: Gain control from beyond the classical receptive field in primate primary visual cortex. Gain control is a salient feature of information processing throughout the visual system. Heeger (1991, 1992) described a mechanism that could underpin gain control in primary visual cortex (VI). According to this model, a neuron's response i...

Bender D.B., 1985: Selective suppression from visual stimuli outside the classical receptive field of neurons in monkey superior colliculus. Society For Neuroscience Abstracts: 1006

Rao, R.P.; Ballard, D.H., 1999: Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. We describe a model of visual processing in which feedback connections from a higher- to a lower-order visual cortical area carry predictions of lower-level neural activities, whereas the feedforward connections carry the residual errors between t...

Bretzner, F.; Aïtoubah, J.; Shumikhina, S.; Tan, Y.F.; Molotchnikoff, S., 2000: Stimuli outside the classical receptive field modulate the synchronization of action potentials between cells in visual cortex of cats. It is proposed that various attributes of an image are bound neuronally when responsive units fire in synchrony. Our investigations describe the influences of the contextual stimuli upon the occurrence of synchronization, in anaesthetized cats. On...

Oakley, N.M.; Jones, H.E.; Murphy, P.C.; Sillito, A.M., 2001: Cells in cat visual cortex are sharply orientation tuned to stimuli excluding the centre of the classical receptive field. Though the relative contribution of thalamic afferents and intracortical circuitry to cortical orientation tuning provokes debate, it is widely accepted that summation of geniculate inputs within the CRF of layer 4 cells plays a major role. With t...

Marrocco R.T.; Mcclurkin J.W.; Alkire M.T., 1989: Concurrent visual stimulation of the receptive field periphery affects phase of responses to stimuli in the classical receptive field. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 30(3 SUPPL): 297