+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Never the twain shall meet?--a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research



Never the twain shall meet?--a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research



Implementation Science 8: 63



Many of society's health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science. Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature. There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054595835

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23758952

DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-63


Related references

Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science 8(1): 63, 2013

Policy research and the policy process: do the twain ever meet?. Gatekeeper Series Sustainable Agriculture Programme, International Institute for Environment and Development ( 74): 20 pp., 1998

Implementation science perspectives and opportunities for HIV/AIDS research: integrating science, practice, and policy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 63(Suppl. 1): S26-S31, 2013

An implementation science perspective on psychological science and cancer: what is known and opportunities for research, policy, and practice. American Psychologist 70(2): 211-220, 2016

Global implementation of advanced urological care: Policy implementation research. Canadian Urological Association Journal 11(6): 157-160, 2017

Goal-setting for Finnish forest research policy of the 1970s. a plan concerning the potential effectiveness of forest research activities in the implementation of the government science policy program. Acta forestalia Fennica: 142, 1974

Republished research: Implementation research: what it is and how to do it: implementation research is a growing but not well understood field of health research that can contribute to more effective public health and clinical policies and programmes. This article provides a broad definition of implementation research and outlines key principles for how to do it. British Journal of Sports Medicine 48(8): 731-736, 2014

Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 26(4): 448-464, 2016

Blending Quality Improvement and Research Methods for Implementation Science, Part III: Analysis of the Effectiveness of Implementation. AACN Advanced Critical Care 27(1): 103-110, 2017

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 4: 50, 2009

Developing the tools of implementation science in substance use disorders treatment: applications of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 25(2): 262-268, 2011

Supplement 1: Public health, health sector reforms, and policy implementation in South Africa: Studies and perspectives on the 24th anniversary of the Centre for Health Policy || Occupational lung disease in the South African mining industry: Research and policy implementation. Journal of Public Health Policy 32: S65-S79, 2011

Implementation science approaches for integrating eHealth research into practice and policy. International Journal of Medical Informatics 83(7): E1-11, 2015

Qualitative research and implementation science: Informing the acceptability and implementation of a trial of a conditional cash transfer intervention designed to reduce drug use and HIV risk. Methodological Innovations 9, 2019

Global cardiovascular research training for implementation science, health systems research, and health policy research. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 65(13): 1371-1372, 2015