Section 55
Chapter 54,659

Cleaning Efficiency of Root Canal after Irrigation with new Irrigation Technique: a Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

Shalan, L.A.; Al-Huwaizi, H.F.

Iranian Endodontic Journal 13(1): 102-107


ISSN/ISBN: 1735-7497
PMID: 29692844
DOI: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.17285
Accession: 054658984

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of pressurized water irrigation technique (AquaPick Device) as an intra-canal irrigation technique and compare it with sonic irrigation device (Endoactivator) for their ability to remove smear layer from canals. Total number of 80 single rooted teeth (premolars) were prepared, divided into eight main groups, Group 1: Aquapick with apically vented needle/18 mm depth, Group 2: Aquapick with apically vented needle/15 mm depth, Group 3: Endoactivator device/18 mm depth, Group 4: Endoactivator device/15 mm depth, Group5: Aquapick with 2 side vented needle/18 mm depth, Group 6: Aquapick with 2 side vented needle/15 mm depth and two control groups. Then all samples were tested by SEM in 3, 6 and 9-mm distances from the apical foramen. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. There was a high significant difference among the tested groups with the best removal of smear layer by the use of pressurized water irrigation device with apical vented needle especially at the 3 mm area. Pressurized water irrigation technique could be used as intra-canal irrigation technique with good results.

PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90