+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Novel active fixation mechanism permits precise placement of a left ventricular lead: early results from a multicenter clinical study

Novel active fixation mechanism permits precise placement of a left ventricular lead: early results from a multicenter clinical study

Heart Rhythm 11(7): 1150-1155

Left ventricular (LV) lead implantation for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with lead dislodgement rates ranging from 3% to 10%, and some implant approaches to prevent dislodgement may contribute to suboptimal CRT response. We report our early human experience with an LV lead with a side helix for active fixation to the coronary vein wall. To assess the feasibility and safety of the Model 20066 LV lead and to evaluate the implant procedure. The Model 20066 is a 4-F bipolar steroid eluting lead that has a small exposed side helix and can be delivered using a guidewire or stylet. At the desired vein location, the lead body is rotated clockwise until the helix is fixated. This study was a single-arm, prospective, nonrandomized trial that enrolled 40 patients from 4 centers who met standard indications for CRT. The lead was successfully implanted in 39 of 40 (98%) patients. In 38 of 40 (95%) patients, the implanters were successful at implanting at a predetermined target site. There were no Model 20066 LV lead dislodgements reported within 12 months of follow-up. The electrical performance of the tip and ring electrodes was stable through the 12-month follow-up visit and similar to other LV leads. Overall lead handling was rated as acceptable for all implants. This new LV lead specifically designed with an active fixation mechanism for stability and precise placement was successfully and safely deployed in the coronary vasculature.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054667893

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24801899

DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.020

Related references

Bipolar active fixation left ventricular lead or quadripolar passive fixation lead? An Italian multicenter experience. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 20(4): 192-200, 2019

Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm 9(11): 1822-1828, 2012

Active fixation of a thin transvenous left-ventricular lead by a side helix facilitates targeted and stable placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace 18(8): 1235-1240, 2016

Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling Elicited by a Quadripolar Lead: Results from the Multicenter Per4mer Study. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 39(3): 250-260, 2016

New left ventricular active fixation lead: The experience of lead extraction. Indian Heart Journal 67(Suppl. 3): S97-S99, 2015

Late left ventricular lead displacement and treatment with a new endovenous active fixation lead. Europace 9(12): 1182-1183, 2007

Influence of left ventricular lead position on clinical outcomes in the COMPANION study: does placement really matter?. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 20(7): 769-772, 2009

Late left ventricular perforation by active fixation pacemaker lead implanted in the right ventricular septum. Journal of Cardiac Surgery 27(4): 530-531, 2012

Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study. Heart Rhythm 12(4): 751-758, 2015

Risks of spontaneous injury and extraction of an active fixation pacemaker lead: report of the Accufix Multicenter Clinical Study and Worldwide Registry. Circulation 100(23): 2344-2352, 1999

Epicardial versus transvenous left ventricular lead placement in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a randomized prospective study. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 56(5): 256-261, 2008

Effects of epicardial versus transvenous left ventricular lead placement on left ventricular function and cardiac perfusion in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 28(8): 917-923, 2017

Patients with left bundle branch block and left axis deviation show a specific left ventricular asynchrony pattern: Implications for left ventricular lead placement during CRT implantation. Journal of Electrocardiology 51(2): 175-181, 2017

Reversing cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder status in a patient with a surgically placed epicardial left ventricular lead by switching to an active fixation coronary sinus lead. Europace 10(10): 1234-1235, 2008

Prognostic benefit of optimum left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: follow-up of the TARGET Study Cohort (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Jacc. Heart Failure 2(3): 205-212, 2014