+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Optimal cost reimbursement of health insurers to reduce risk selection

Optimal cost reimbursement of health insurers to reduce risk selection

Health Economics 20(5): 532-552

In the absence of a perfect risk adjustment scheme, reimbursing health insurers' costs can reduce risk selection in community-rated health insurance markets. In this paper, we develop a model in which insurers determine the cost efficiency of health care and have incentives for risk selection. We derive the optimal cost reimbursement function, which balances the incentives for cost efficiency and risk selection. For health cost data from a Swiss health insurer, we find that an optimal cost reimbursement scheme should reimburse costs only up to a threshold.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054768452

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20572200

DOI: 10.1002/hec.1614

Related references

A Catch-22: Neurologists Can Prescribe Off-Label, But Risk Health Insurers Denials for Reimbursement. Neurology Today 11(7): 28-30, 2011

How can insurers influence the cost of health care and reduce its rate of increase?. Risk Management 28(6): 28-30, 1981

Selection Incentives for Health Insurers in the Presence of Sophisticated Risk Adjustment. Medical Care Research and Review 2019: 1077558719825982, 2019

Third-party reimbursement for generic prescription drugs: The prevalence of below-cost reimbursement in an environment of maximum allowable cost-based reimbursement. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 58(4): 421-425, 2018

Optimal cost apportionment can increase Medicare reimbursement. Hospital Financial Management 34(6): 50-56, 1980

Malpractice insurers endorse electronic records as a way to reduce risk. Health Data Management 4(6): 67-8 70 72, 1996

Do laws restricting the use of genetic information reduce discrimination by health insurers?. American Journal of Human Genetics 65(4): A3, 1999

A new prevention paradox: the trade-off between reducing incentives for risk selection and increasing the incentives for prevention for health insurers. Social Science and Medicine 76(1): 150-158, 2013

Health insurers seek cost parity with Medicare. National Underwriter. Life and Health Insurance Edition 86(44): 9, 1982

Health insurers well positioned, but must plan for cost pressure. Managed Care 17(12): 24-26, 2008

Carcinoembryonic antigen--a paradoxical risk selection tool for insurers. Journal of Insurance Medicine 39(4): 259-263, 2007

The 80/20 Rule: Why Medical Insurers Are Not Interested in Cost Cutting (or Integrative Health) … plus more. Integrative Medicine 15(5): 18-20, 2016

Health Insurers Struggle to Manage Number, Cost of Genetic Tests. Managed Care 25(4): 20-23, 2016

A comparative study of current Medicaid prescription reimbursement (MAC/EAC) (maximum allowable cost/estimated acquisition cost) with prescription reimbursement based on a competitive market. Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management 3(2): 37-46, 1988

Insurers' response to selection risk: Evidence from Medicare enrollment reforms. Journal of Health Economics 56: 383-396, 2017