+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing



Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing



Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 35(1): 63-65



Skin testing remains the preferred method for most allergists for establishing the presence of allergen sensitization. This study examined the performance of a new single-site skin test device that incorporates initial pressure to reduce the sensation of pain. Comparators were a conventional skin testing system and a smallpox needle. Twenty subjects were tested on the back, four sites with histamine and four sites with saline with each of the three skin testing devices. The single-site skin test device was applied with downward pressure, the conventional skin testing system, and smallpox needle (SPN) by pricking at a 45°angle. Outcomes were size and reproducibility of the skin test reactions and discomfort, as graded by the subject. The whealing responses to histamine were larger with the conventional skin testing system than with the single-site skin test device and both produced larger wheals than the SPN. The conventional skin testing system also produced greater intrasubject variability. Only the conventional skin testing system produced wheals of >3 mm with saline. There was no significant difference in perception of pain, which was low with all three devices. All three devices were well tolerated, without a significant difference in perception of discomfort. Testing with histamine revealed differences in wheal size and reproducibility among the three devices and testing with saline revealed differing likelihood of inducing a significantly sized wheal.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054847165

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24433598

DOI: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3714


Related references

Comparative performance for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing using two skin prick test devices. Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology 5(6): 354-356, 1995

Vibration perception threshold: are multiple sites of testing superior to single site testing on diabetic foot examination?. Ostomy/Wound Management 44(5): 70, 1998

Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 79(1): 27-34, 1997

Evaluation of inhaler handling-errors, inhaler perception and preference with Spiromax, Easyhaler and Turbuhaler devices among healthy Finnish volunteers: a single site, single visit crossover study (Finhaler). Bmj Open Respiratory Research 3(1): E000119, 2016

A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 27(6): 473-478, 2006

A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 84(2): 168-174, 1989

Alternative site testing at the earlobe tip: reliability of glucose measurements and pain perception. Diabetes Care 27(2): 616-617, 2004

Performance evaluation of four on-site drug-testing devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 24(7): 589-594, 2000

Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. in Practice 3(6): 888-893, 2016

Influence of experimental pain on the perception of action capabilities and performance of a maximal single-leg hop. Journal of Pain 15(3): 271.E1-7, 2014

Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between single-site access (SSA) devices and an independent-port SSA approach. Surgical Endoscopy 26(3): 714-721, 2012

Testing single and double limb standing balance performance: comparison of COP path length evaluation between two devices. Gait and Posture 36(3): 439-443, 2012

Skin prick testing using allergen-coated lancets: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet applied with varying pressures. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 21(5): 589-593, 1991

Comparison between skin testing and in vitro testing for diagnosis of allergen in asthmatic children. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 54(4): 246-250, 1994

Studies on devices for testing tractor performance. A device for testing PTO performance. Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery 49(4): 381-390, 1987