+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging



Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging



Medical Physics 34(2): 499-506



The evolution of ever more conformal radiation delivery techniques makes the subject of accurate localization of increasing importance in radiotherapy. Several systems can be utilized including kilo-voltage and mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (MV-CBCT), CT on rail or helical tomography. One of the attractive aspects of mega-voltage cone-beam CT is that it uses the therapy beam along with an electronic portal imaging device to image the patient prior to the delivery of treatment. However, the use of a photon beam energy in the mega-voltage range for volumetric imaging degrades the image quality and increases the patient radiation dose. To optimize image quality and patient dose in MV-CBCT imaging procedures, a series of dose measurements in cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms using an ionization chamber, radiographic films, and thermoluminescent dosimeters was performed. Furthermore, the dependence of the contrast to noise ratio and spatial resolution of the image upon the dose delivered for a 20-cm-diam cylindrical phantom was evaluated. Depending on the anatomical site and patient thickness, we found that the minimum dose deposited in the irradiated volume was 5-9 cGy and the maximum dose was between 9 and 17 cGy for our clinical MV-CBCT imaging protocols. Results also demonstrated that for high contrast areas such as bony anatomy, low doses are sufficient for image registration and visualization of the three-dimensional boundaries between soft tissue and bony structures. However, as the difference in tissue density decreased, the dose required to identify soft tissue boundaries increased. Finally, the dose delivered by MV-CBCT was simulated using a treatment planning system (TPS), thereby allowing the incorporation of MV-CBCT dose in the treatment planning process. The TPS-calculated doses agreed well with measurements for a wide range of imaging protocols.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054887188

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17388167

DOI: 10.1118/1.2428407


Related references

IMRT planning and delivery incorporating daily dose from mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Medical Physics 34(10): 3760-3767, 2007

Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging. Investigative Radiology 49(10): 675-684, 2014

Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma--image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52(1): 76-80, 2014

A comprehensive evaluation of angular range and separation on image quality, image registration, and imaging dose for cone beam computed tomography in radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry 44(1): 67-73, 2018

A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging. European Radiology 25(7): 1891-1900, 2015

Monitoring tumor motion with on-line mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging in a cine mode. Physics in Medicine and Biology 53(4): 823-836, 2008

Effect of diagnostic cone-beam computed tomography protocols on image quality, patient dose, and lesion detection. Physica Medica 32(12): 1575-1583, 2016

Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography. Physica Medica 36: 110-118, 2017

Quantifying the image quality and dose reduction of respiratory triggered 4D cone-beam computed tomography with patient-measured breathing. Physics in Medicine and Biology 60(24): 9493-9513, 2015

Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 75(5): 384-398, 2014

Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy. European Radiology 23(6): 1582-1593, 2013

Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments. Swedish Dental Journal. Supplement 2010(209): 4-55, 2010

Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 37(6): 309-318, 2008

Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation. Clinical Oral Investigations 18(1): 301-311, 2014

Tilting the jaw to improve the image quality or to reduce the dose in cone-beam computed tomography. European Journal of Radiology 80(3): E389-E393, 2011