+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period



Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period



Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 124(1): 1-8



Expander/implant and autogenous tissue breast reconstructions have different aging processes, and the time when these processes stabilize is unclear. The authors' goal was to evaluate long-term patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with expander/implant and autogenous breast reconstruction. The authors surveyed a cross-section of University of Michigan women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction (response rate, 73 percent) between 1988 and 2006 [110 expander/implant and 109 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) reconstructions]. Each group was stratified into three postreconstructive periods: short term (8 years). Validated satisfaction items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; scores were dichotomized into positive and negative responses. Logistic regression assessed satisfaction by procedure, while controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Mean follow-up time after reconstruction was 6.5 years (range, 1 to 18 years). Procedure type had no effect on short-term aesthetic satisfaction. However, in the long term, reconstruction type considerably affected satisfaction. Although satisfaction with TRAM reconstruction remained relatively constant, satisfaction with expander/implants was significantly less among those patients in the long term. Patients who had undergone implant reconstruction more than 8 years earlier, compared with those who undergone implant reconstruction less than 5 years earlier, were significantly less satisfied with breast appearance (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.48), softness (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.64), and size (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.62). In the long term, TRAM patients, compared with expander/implant patients, appear to have significantly greater aesthetic satisfaction. These long-term data have important implications for women's health in the survivorship period and will help women navigate the complex decision-making process of breast reconstruction.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054892122

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19568038

DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2


Related references

A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 118(4): 832-839, 2006

A prospective study of mastectomy patients with and without delayed breast reconstruction: long-term psychosocial functioning in the breast cancer survivorship period. Journal of Surgical Oncology 111(3): 258-264, 2015

A Prospective Study of Mastectomy Patients With and Without Delayed Breast Reconstruction: Long-Term Psychosocial Functioning in the Breast Cancer Survivorship Period. Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly 27(2): 139-140, 2016

Change of Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcome Over Time and Identification of Factors Characterizing Poor Aesthetic Outcome After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Cohort Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology 23(5): 1744-1751, 2016

Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 146(1): 117-126, 2015

Long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implant reconstruction. Annals of Surgical Oncology 20(11): 3422-3429, 2014

The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of long-term surgical outcomes, aesthetic results, and satisfaction over 13 years. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 134(4): 588-595, 2014

Impact of reconstruction and reoperation on long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology 22(2): 401-408, 2015

A population-based approach to compare patient-reported outcomes of long-term Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors according to trial participation: a joint study from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship registry and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 26 Joining Forces for Better Cancer Registration in Europe: S223-S228, 2017

Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 126(1): 26-36, 2010

Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surgery 153(10): 891-899, 2018

Oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction improves patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome for central breast tumours. Anz Journal of Surgery 2019, 2019

Subcutaneous expanders and synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction: Long-term and patient-reported BREAST-Q outcomes of a single-center prospective study. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2019, 2019

Prospective evaluation of a single-sided innervated gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction for extensive and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: functional, aesthetic, and patient-reported long-term outcomes. World Journal of Surgery 36(9): 2230-2236, 2012

Prospective evaluation of a single-sided innervated gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of extensive and recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: functional, aesthetic, and patient-reported long-term outcomes. World Journal of Surgery 36(9): 2237-2238, 2012