+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study

Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study

Bmc Medicine 9: 49

Changing clinicians' behaviour is recognised as a major challenge. It is clear that behaviour change not only depends on demonstrating the proven effectiveness of clinical interventions; contextual and occupational factors, such as 'change readiness', may be central to their implementation. This paper highlights the context of behaviour change in relation to a healthcare innovation introduced within primary care, highlighting the importance of organisational and interpersonal factors that may help explain the dynamics of implementation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with general practitioners (GPs) before (n = 32) and after (n = 9) the introduction of a subgrouping for targeted treatment system. GPs were offered an electronic six-item subgrouping tool, to identify patients according to their risk of poor outcome ('high', 'low') in order to help inform their decision making about treatment approaches. Recruitment was based on a 'maximum diversification sample', to obtain a wide representation of views across all five practices. A coding scheme was developed based on the emergent findings, and the data were analysed using 'constant comparison', drawing upon insights and developing connections between themes. We adopted the normalisation process theory (NPT) to explain the uptake of the new system and to examine the relevance of coherence for the implementation of innovations in organisations. GPs perceived back pain as a low clinical priority, and highlighted the importance of 'practical' and 'relational' coherence in decisions to adopt and engage with the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system. Health professionals often engage in 'sense making' about new innovations to 'road test' their applicability or relevance to daily clinical routines. Low back pain was generally perceived as an 'uninteresting' and clinically unchallenging health problem by GPs, which may partly explain their lack of engagement with the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system. The adoption of this new way of working by GPs was determined by the meaning that they ascribed to it in the context of their daily clinical routines. We conclude that the key obstacle to implementation of the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system for low back pain in primary care was an initial failure to achieve 'coherence' of the desired practice change with GPs. Despite this, GPs used the tool to different degrees, though this signified a general commitment to participating in the study rather than a deeper attitude change towards the new system.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054918556

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21554696

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-49

Related references

General practitioners' perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study. Bmj Open 9(5): E028251, 2019

General Practitioners Views of Implementing a Stratified Treatment Approach for Low Back Pain in Germany: A Qualitative Study. Plos one 10(8): E0136119, 2015

Preferences for Web-Based Information Material for Low Back Pain: Qualitative Interview Study on People Consulting a General Practitioner. Jmir Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 5(1): E7, 2018

Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers - a qualitative study. Bmc Health Services Research 3(1): 8-0, 2003

Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers--a qualitative study. Bmc Health Services Research 3(1): 8, 2003

Straightforward consultation or complicated condition? General practitioners' perceptions of low back pain. European Journal of General Practice 9(1): 3-9, 2003

General practitioners' perceptions of working with the certification of sickness absences following changes in the Swedish social security system: a qualitative focus-group study. Bmc Family Practice 16: 21, 2015

'Personal Care' and General Practice Medicine in the UK: A qualitative interview study with patients and General Practitioners. Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 1: 13, 2007

'Oral health is not my department'. Perceptions of elderly patients' oral health by general medical practitioners in primary health care centres: a qualitative interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 21(1): 126-133, 2007

Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter. Bmc Family Practice 7: 11, 2006

General practitioners' perceptions of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative study. Journal of Antimicrobial ChemoTherapy 59(2): 292-296, 2007

General practitioners' perceptions of different practice models: a qualitative study. Australian Journal of Primary Health 22(5): 388-393, 2016

Recently-qualified general practitioners' perceptions and experiences of General Practice Specialty Training (GPST) in deprived areas of NHS Scotland - a qualitative study. Education for Primary Care 30(3): 158-164, 2019

What is "the good back-consultation"? A combined qualitative and quantitative study of chronic low back pain patients' interaction with and perceptions of consultations with specialists. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 38(4): 255-262, 2006

General Practitioners' Perspective on eHealth and Lifestyle Change: Qualitative Interview Study. Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth 6(4): E88, 2018