+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Perceptions of nurses in magnet® hospitals, non-magnet hospitals, and hospitals pursuing magnet status

Perceptions of nurses in magnet® hospitals, non-magnet hospitals, and hospitals pursuing magnet status

Journal of Nursing Administration 41(7-8): 315-323

: The objective of the study was to compare perceptions of RNs employed in Magnet®, in-process (ie, hospitals seeking Magnet recognition), and non-Magnet hospitals using data from the 2010 National Survey of Registered Nurses (NSRN). : The NSRN is administered biennially and measures nurses' perceptions about their profession, workplace environment, and professional relationships. : Self-administered mail survey to a national sample of 1,500 RNs was used. Bivariate statistical techniques were used to analyze responses from 518 nurses who indicated their employer's Magnet status and to examine associations between Magnet status and the nurses' perceptions of career satisfaction, the nursing shortage, work environment, opportunities to influence the workplace, and professional relationships. : Nurses employed in all 3 groups (Magnet, in-process, and non-Magnet hospitals) were uniformly satisfied with being a nurse, although significantly more Magnet and in-process nurses would recommend nursing as a career than would non-Magnet RNs. Views of workplace safety were similar across groups, with no significant differences in violence, verbal abuse, discrimination, or harassment; however, Magnet nurses reported significantly more musculoskeletal injuries. Magnet and in-process nurses rated opportunities to influence decisions about workplace organization and participate in shared governance and employer-paid continuing education, and relationships with advanced practice nurses and nursing faculty higher than did non-Magnet nurses; relationships with new nurses and physicians were not different across groups. : The Magnet program continues to have a positive influence on nurses, their decision making, and their professional relationships. The paucity of other differences suggests that Magnet, in-process, and non-Magnet organizations are increasingly guided by a shared set of principles that define a positive professional environment derived not only by the Magnet program, but also by other professional organizations and forces.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054918731

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21799363

DOI: 10.1097/nna.0b013e31822509e2

Related references

Do Magnet®-accredited hospitals show improvements in nurse and patient outcomes compared to non-Magnet hospitals: a systematic review. Jbi Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 13(6): 168-219, 2015

Hospitals In 'Magnet' Program Show Better Patient Outcomes On Mortality Measures Compared To Non-'Magnet' Hospitals. Health Affairs 34(6): 986-992, 2015

Nursing support, workload, and intent to stay in Magnet, Magnet-aspiring, and non-Magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 37(4): 199-205, 2007

Evidence-Based Practice and Job-Related Nurse Outcomes at Magnet-Aspiring, Magnet-Conforming, and Non-Magnet University Hospitals in Finland. Jona Journal of Nursing Administration 46(10): 513-520, 2016

Evidence-Based Practice and Job-Related Nurse Outcomes at Magnet®-Aspiring, Magnet-Conforming, and Non-Magnet University Hospitals in Finland: A Comparison Study. Journal of Nursing Administration 46(10): 513-520, 2016

Magnet and non magnet hospitals: outcomes on patients, nurses and organizations. A systematic review. Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca 27(4): 210-216, 2009

A comparison of working conditions among nurses in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 40(7-8): 309-315, 2010

Decisional involvement in Magnet®, magnet-aspiring, and non-magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 42(12): 586-591, 2012

Differences between pediatric registered nurses' perception of organizational support, intent to stay, workload, and overall satisfaction, and years employed as a nurse in magnet and non-magnet pediatric hospitals: implications for administrators. Nursing Administration Quarterly 33(1): 6, 2009

The Magnet Nursing Services Recognition Program: a comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals. JournalofNursingAdministration39(7-8Suppl):S5, 2009

Magnet hospitals are a magnet for higher survival rates at adult trauma centers. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 77(1): 89-94, 2014

Diagnostic Imaging Services in Magnet and Non-Magnet Hospitals: Trends in Utilization and Costs. Journal of the American College of Radiology 12(12 Pt B): 1357-1363, 2015

Is there a business case for magnet hospitals? Estimates of the cost and revenue implications of becoming a magnet. Medical Care 52(5): 400-406, 2014

Understanding the Role of the Professional Practice Environment on Quality of Care in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 45(10 Suppl): S52-S58, 2015

Magnetic work environments: Patient experience outcomes in Magnet versus non-Magnet hospitals. Health Care Management Review 45(1): 21-31, 2018