+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Perfusion imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a study comparing quantitative continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T



Perfusion imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a study comparing quantitative continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T



Magnetic Resonance Imaging 29(9): 1157-1164



Assessment of hemodynamics in arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is important for estimating the risk of bleeding as well as planning and monitoring therapy. In tissues with perfusion values significantly higher than cerebral cortex, continuous arterial spin labeling (CASL) permits both adequate representation and quantification of perfusion. Thirteen patients who had cerebral AVMs were examined with two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques: perfusion imaging using a CASL technique with two delay times, 800 and 1200 ms, and T(2)-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (T(2)-DCE-MRI). The signal-to-noise ratio obtained in our study with the CASL technique at 3 T was sufficient to estimate perfusion in gray matter. Both nidal and venous perfusion turned out larger by factors of 1.71±2.01 and 2.48±1.51 in comparison to T(2)-DCE-MRI when using CASL at delay times of 800 and 1200 ms, respectively. Moreover, the venous and nidal perfusion values of the AVMs measured at T(2)-DCE-MRI did not correlate with those observed at CASL. Evaluation of average perfusion values yielded significantly different results when using a shorter versus a longer delay time. Average gray matter perfusion was 15.8% larger when measured at delay times of w=800 ms versus w=1200 ms, while nidal perfusion was 15.7% larger and venous perfusion was 34.6% larger, respectively. In conclusion, the extremely high perfusion within an AVM could be successfully quantified using CASL. A shorter postlabeling delay time of w=800 ms seems to be more appropriate than a longer time of w=1200 ms because of possible inflow of unlabeled spins at the latter.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 054928911

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21920687

DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.07.026


Related references

Brain tumor perfusion: comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2, and T2* contrast, pulsed arterial spin labeling, and H2(15)O positron emission tomography. European Journal of Radiology 70(3): 465-474, 2008

Perfusion of the placenta assessed using arterial spin labeling and ferumoxytol dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the rhesus macaque. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018, 2018

Comparative evaluation of 3-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in grading of human glioma. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 37(3): 321-326, 2013

Evaluation of the degree of arteriovenous shunting in intracranial arteriovenous malformations using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiology 57(8): 775-782, 2016

Cerebral perfusion information obtained by dynamic contrast-enhanced phase-shift magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with model-free arterial spin labelling. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 30(5): 375-379, 2010

Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 27(1): 85-93, 2006

Usefulness of Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging in New-onset Seizure Patients and Its Comparison with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice 8(4): 569-574, 2017

Optimal individual inversion time in brain arterial spin labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with carotid hemodynamics measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 37(2): 247-251, 2013

Renal perfusion 3-T MR imaging: a comparative study of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques. Radiology 261(3): 845-853, 2012

Multi-parameter arterial spin labeling versus dynamic magnetic-sensitive enhanced cerebral perfusion imaging for diagnosis of transient cerebral ischemic attack. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 36(6): 768-774, 2016

Clinical assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in Moyamoya disease via multiple inversion time arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study. Journal of Neuroradiology. Journal de Neuroradiologie 44(4): 273-280, 2017

Arterial Spin Labeling Cerebral Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Migraine Aura: An Observational Study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 27(5): 1262-1266, 2018

Quantitative Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow in Enhanced Psedo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 38(6): 679-685, 2017

Hypertension and cerebral vasoreactivity: a continuous arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging study. Hypertension 56(5): 859-864, 2010

Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: toward noninvasive diagnosis and follow-up of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics 15(4): 451-458, 2015