+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Positive end expiratory pressure for preterm infants requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome or bronchopulmonary dysplasia



Positive end expiratory pressure for preterm infants requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome or bronchopulmonary dysplasia



Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1: Cd004500



Conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) of neonates has been used as a treatment of respiratory failure for over 30 years. While CMV facilitates gas exchange, it may simultaneously damage the lung. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) has received less attention than other ventilation parameters when considering this balance of benefit and possible harm. While an appropriate level of PEEP may exert substantial benefits in ventilation, both inappropriately low or high levels may lead to harm. An appropriate level of PEEP for neonates may also be best achieved by an individualized approach. 1. To compare the effects of different levels of PEEP in preterm newborn infants requiring CMV for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).2. To compare the effects of different levels of PEEP in preterm infants requiring CMV for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).3. To compare the effects of different methods for individualizing PEEP to an optimal level in preterm newborn infants requiring CMV for RDS. The search was performed in accordance with the standard search strategy for the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, study references and experts were utilized for study identification. All randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials studying preterm infants (less than 37 weeks gestational age) requiring CMV with endotracheal intubation and undergoing randomization to either different PEEP levels (RDS or BPD) or two or more alternative methods for individualizing PEEP levels (RDS only) were included. Cross-over trials were included but we limited the findings to those in the first cross-over period. Data collection and analysis were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. An initial evaluation identified 10 eligible articles. Ultimately, a single study met our inclusion criteria. The study addressed the effects of different levels of PEEP in preterm newborn infants requiring CMV for RDS. Only short term physiologic measures were reported. All results were limited to a small sample size without statistically significant results. No trials addressing the effect of PEEP in infants with BPD or strategies to individualize the management of PEEP were identified. There is insufficient evidence to guide selection of appropriate PEEP levels for RDS or CMV. There is a need for well designed clinical trials evaluating the optimal application of this important and frequently applied intervention.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055060190

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22258957

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004500.pub2


Related references

Positive end-expiratory pressure for preterm infants requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2: Cd004500, 2019

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation during weaning from mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Biology of the Neonate 74(Suppl. 1): 51-52, Sept, 1998

High frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatric Research 37(4 Part 2): 347A, 1994

Pulmonary function in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with high frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional mechanical ventilation. Pediatric Research 37(4 Part 2): 204A, 1994

Immediate effect of lengthened inspiratory time on pulmonary function in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. Pediatric Research 33(4 Part 2): 339A, 1993

Assessment of pulmonary function of preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome at different positive end expiratory pressure levels. Jornal de Pediatria 78(5): 403-408, 2003

Combined effects of inhaled nitric oxide and positive end-expiratory pressure during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Artificial Organs 24(5): 390-395, 2000

Comparison of INSURE method with conventional mechanical ventilation after surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: therapeutic challenge. Acta Medica Iranica 52(8): 596-600, 2015

Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 29(10): 1546-1551, 2016

Electrical impedance tomography monitoring in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with mechanical ventilation during prolonged positive end-expiratory pressure adjustments. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 115(3): 195-202, 2017

Comparison of assisted ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure with intermittent mandatory ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure in adult respiratory distress syndrome patients. American Review of Respiratory Disease 117(4 Part 2): 129, 1978

Growth and development of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics 77(3): 345-352, 1986

Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2018, 2018

Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 166(4): 372-376, 2012

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date. Pediatric Pulmonology 50(4): 402-409, 2016