+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants in a 10-year prospective comparative study



Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants in a 10-year prospective comparative study



International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 25(6): 1168-1174



The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with either two or four mandibular endosseous implants with an overdenture on mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption over a 10-year period. Sixty edentulous patients with residual mandibular height between 12 and 18 mm participated. Thirty patients were treated with an overdenture supported by two IMZ implants (group A) and 30 patients were treated with an overdenture with four IMZ implants (group B). Before treatment and 10 years after treatment, panoramic radiographs were taken and compared to ascertain possible bone loss. Proportional area measurements were used to determine changes in the mandibular posterior residual ridge bilaterally. There was a statistically significant difference in mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption between the two treatment protocols. The posterior bone area index was reduced by a mean of 10% for group A and 6% for group B over 10 years. There was a significant difference in mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption between patients treated with either two or four implants to stabilize an overdenture. No correlation was shown between mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption and peri-implant marginal bone loss. The confounding factors of marginal bone loss around the implants, age, gender, initial mandibular height, and the number of years the patient had been edentulous failed to show a significant effect on posterior ridge resorption.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055070057

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21197494

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60074-7


Related references

Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16(1): 19-25, 2005

Residual ridge resorption in the edentulous maxilla in patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: an 8-year retrospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 16(3): 295-300, 2003

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results. Clinical Oral Implants Research 9(6): 374-383, 1998

Implant-supported versus implant-retained distal extension mandibular partial overdentures and residual ridge resorption: a 5-year retrospective radiographic study in men. International Journal of Prosthodontics 24(4): 306-313, 2011

Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant overdentures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 18(3): 447-452, 2003

Posterior alveolar ridge resorption in bar-retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year results of a prospective clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 26(12): 1397-1401, 2015

Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(7): 722-728, 2009

Posterior Mandibular Ridge Resorption Associated with Different Retentive Systems for Overdentures: A 7-Year Retrospective Preliminary Study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 30(3): 260–265, 2017

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a 5-year prospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31(7): 522-526, 2004

Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants: A prospective, comparative study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 27(6): 435-439, 1998

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 36(9): 799-806, 2009

Mandibular overdentures supported by 6-mm dental implants: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14(Suppl. 1): E59, 2012

Immediate loading of Brånemark implants: a 24-month follow-up of a comparative prospective pilot study between mandibular overdentures supported by Conical transmucosal and standard MK II implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 4(4): 190-199, 2002

Effects of posterior ridge resorption and attachment wear on periimplant strain in mandibular two-implant-supported overdentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 114(6): 839-847, 2015

A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants; a 3 year follow-up report. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 16(3): 323-329, 2014