+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Preference-based quality of life measures in people with visual impairment

Optometry and Vision Science 84(8): 809-816
Preference-based quality of life measures in people with visual impairment
The use of preference-based measures of quality of life represents the application of principles of decision theory and welfare economics to the measurement of health-related concepts. In this Perspective, we present the theoretical basis of preference-based measures in the assessment of the impact of vision-related disease on quality of life and their role in cost-effectiveness analysis. We discuss the use of the standard gamble and time trade-off in eliciting utilities and the limitations of both methods. Scaling issues related to utility are discussed, in particular the reasons for use of the "policy scale" (i.e., a scale where utilities are anchored at 1.0 for perfect health and 0 as death). This is contrasted with the use of the "vision-truncated scale" (i.e., a scale with 1.0 representing perfect vision and 0 being death), which is commonly used in assessment of vision-related utilities. We discuss problematic aspects of using the truncated scale in conducting cost-effectiveness research for vision-related disease, and provide a theoretical and empirical discussion of these limitations. In particular, we point out how these results raise questions concerning the conceptual relationship between vision- and health-related quality of life. Finally, we present the results of previous cross-cultural and trans-national studies of vision-related quality of life to demonstrate how utility studies might provide insight into the meaning of disease across cultures.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 055116439

PMID: 17700344

DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181337638

Related references

A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders. Value in Health 15(1): 118-127, 2012

Assessment of the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based quality of life measures in people with Parkinson's: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 2016

Measures of visual impairment and dimensions of quality of life in age-related macular degeneration. IOVS 42(4): S722, March 15, 2001

Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49(2): 381-394, 2006

Preference-based quality-of-life measures for neocortical epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 52(5): 1018-1020, 2011

Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures. Pharmacoeconomics 20(5): 289-303, 2002

Challenges in the validation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Medical Care 38(9 Suppl): Ii155-9, 2000

Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Medical Care 38(9 Suppl): Ii138-Ii150, 2000

Assessment of health related quality of life--part 3--preference based measures. Harefuah 147(11): 914-9, 938, 2009

Race and preference-based health-related quality of life measures in the United States. Quality of Life Research 20(6): 969-978, 2012