+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Preferences for family involvement in care among consumers with serious mental illness

Preferences for family involvement in care among consumers with serious mental illness

Psychiatric Services 64(3): 257-263

Despite robust evidence of efficacy, family services for individuals diagnosed as having serious mental illness are of limited availability and drastically underutilized. This underutilization may be due to a mismatch between consumer and family preferences and the services offered. This study is the first systematic report on preferences expressed by consumers with serious mental illness for family involvement. The study enrolled 232 mental health consumers with serious mental illness who had contact with family but did not have any family regularly involved in their mental health care. Consumers were recruited from outpatient mental health clinics at three large medical centers in two Veterans Integrated Service Networks. Interviews elicited demographic characteristics, treatment preferences regarding family involvement, and perceived benefits and barriers to involvement. Chart diagnoses and measures of symptom severity, family functioning, and contact were collected. Seventy-eight percent (171 of 219) of the consumers wanted family members to be involved in their care, and many desired involvement through several methods. Consumers were concerned with the impact of involvement on both themselves and their family member. The consumer's degree of perceived benefit of family involvement significantly predicted the degree of desire for family involvement after analyses controlled for service need (family conflict, family-related quality of life, and symptom severity), enabling factors (family contact and family capacity), demographic variables (age, gender, race, living with family, and marital status), and barriers perceived by the consumer. The extent of overall support for family involvement in care coupled with the heterogeneity of preferred modes and concerns and anticipated benefits underscore the imperative to offer diverse family services and to elicit consumers' preferences regarding whether and how to involve their families.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 055116528

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23242515

DOI: 10.1176/

Related references

Family contact, experience of family relationships, and views about family involvement in treatment among VA consumers with serious mental illness. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 44(6): 801-811, 2007

The residential needs and preferences of persons with serious mental illness: a comparison of consumers and family members. Journal of Mental Health Administration 21(1): 42-51, 1994

A mixed methods exploration of family involvement in medical care for older adults with serious mental illness. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 48(2): 121-133, 2015

Shared decision making in public mental health care: perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 34(1): 29-36, 2010

Exploring the needs of diverse consumers experiencing mental illness and their families through family psychoeducation. Journal of Mental Health 25(3): 197-203, 2015

Care provision and community adjustment of rural consumers with serious mental illness. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 13(1): 19-29, 1999

A role for mental health nursing in the physical health care of consumers with severe mental illness. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 18(8): 706-711, 2012

Evaluating client and family preferences regarding outcomes in severe mental illness. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 29(3): 257-261, 2002

Unmet needs of families of adults with mental illness and preferences regarding family services. Psychiatric Services 59(6): 655-662, 2008

A survey of mental health consumers' and family members' involvement in advocacy. Community Mental Health Journal 34(6): 615-623, 1998

Mental illness, functional impairment, and patient preferences for collaborative care in an uninsured, primary care population. Journal of Family Practice 50(1): 41-47, 2001

What determines whether nurses provide physical health care to consumers with serious mental illness?. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 28(2): 87-93, 2015

Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 16(10): 826-833, 2008

Nurses' views on training needs to increase provision of primary care for consumers with serious mental illness. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 49(3): 210-217, 2014

Family Involvement In Mental Illness. Southern Medical Journal 57: 302-305, 1964