+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prepregnancy body mass index and resting metabolic rate during pregnancy

Prepregnancy body mass index and resting metabolic rate during pregnancy

Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 57(3-4): 221-227

The resting metabolic rate (RMR) varies among pregnant women. The factors responsible for this variability are unknown. This study aimed to assess the influence of the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) on the RMR during late pregnancy. RMR, height, weight, and total (TEE) and activity (AEE) energy expenditures were measured in 46 healthy women aged 31 ± 5 years (mean ± SD) with low (<19.8), normal (19.8-26.0), and high (>26.0) prepregnancy BMI at 38.2 ± 1.5 weeks of gestation (t(gest)) and 40 ± 7 weeks postpartum (t(post)) (n = 27). The mean t(gest) RMR for the low-, normal-, and high-BMI groups was 1,373, 1,807, and 2,191 kcal/day, respectively (p = 0.001). The overall mean t(gest) RMR was 316 ± 183 kcal/day (21%), higher than the overall mean t(post) value and this difference was correlated with gestational weight gain (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). The scaled metabolic rate by allometry (RMR/kilograms⁰·⁷³) was similar in the low-, normal-, and high-BMI groups, respectively (p = 0.45). Changes in t(gest) TEE closely paralleled changes in t(gest) RMR (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). AEE was similar among the BMI groups. The RMR is significantly increased in the third trimester of pregnancy. The absolute gestational RMR is higher in women with high prepregnancy BMI due to increased body weight. The scaled metabolic rate (RMR/kilograms⁰·⁷³) is similar among the BMI groups of pregnant women.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055139116

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21124024

DOI: 10.1159/000322369

Related references

Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes by prepregnancy body mass index: a population-based study to inform prepregnancy weight loss counseling. Obstetrics and Gynecology 125(1): 133-143, 2015

Prediction of resting metabolic rate in critically ill patients at the extremes of body mass index. Jpen. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 37(3): 361-367, 2014

Prepregnancy body mass index in a first uncomplicated pregnancy and outcomes of a second pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 213(4): 548.E1-7, 2015

Prepregnancy body mass index and pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics & Gynecology 97(4 Supplement): 71S, April, 2001

Maternal prepregnancy body mass index and their children's blood pressure and resting cardiac autonomic balance at age 5 to 6 years. Hypertension 62(3): 641-647, 2013

Prepregnancy body mass index and major depression in pregnancy. 2007

Prepregnancy body mass index and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 278(1): 23-26, 2007

Accuracy of four resting metabolic rate prediction equations: effects of sex, body mass index, age, and race/ethnicity. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 14(4): 344-351, 2011

Prepregnancy body mass index and dietary intake in the first trimester of pregnancy. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 19(4): 267-273, 2006

Prepregnancy body mass index, smoking during pregnancy, and infant birth weight. Annals of Epidemiology 21(6): 413-420, 2011

Exercise during pregnancy, maternal prepregnancy body mass index, and birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology 115(2 Pt 1): 331-337, 2010

The association of prepregnancy body mass index with pregnancy outcomes in triplet gestations. American Journal of Perinatology 27(1): 41-46, 2010

Prepregnancy body mass index and the occurrence of severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Epidemiology 18(2): 234-239, 2007

P34. Prepregnancy body mass index, weight gain and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertension 1(3-4): 288, 2011

Primary preeclampsia in the second pregnancy: effects of changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies. Obstetrics and Gynecology 110(6): 1319-1325, 2007