+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population: comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models

Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population: comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models

Plos One 9(2): E87958

Frailty is related to adverse outcomes in the elderly. However, current status and clinical significance of frailty have not been evaluated for the Korean elderly population. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of established frailty criteria for community-dwelling Korean elderly. We also tried to develop and validate a new frailty index based on a multidimensional model. We studied 693 participants of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA). We developed a new frailty index (KLoSHA Frailty Index, KFI) and compared predictability of it with the established frailty indexes from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) and Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF). Mortality, hospitalization, and functional decline were evaluated. The prevalence of frailty was 9.2% (SOF index), 13.2% (CHS index), and 15.6% (KFI). The criteria from CHS and KFI correlated with each other, but SOF did not correlate with KFI. During the follow-up period (5.6 ± 0.9 years), 97 participants (14.0%) died. Frailty defined by KFI predicted mortality better than CHS index (c-index: 0.713 and 0.596, respectively; p<0.001, better for KFI). In contrast, frailty by SOF index was not related to mortality. The KFI showed better predictability for following functional decline than CHS index (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.937 for KFI and 0.704 for CHS index, p = 0.001). However, the SOF index could not predict subsequent functional decline. Frailty by the KFI (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.04-4.35) and CHS index (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.05-4.76) were associated with hospitalization. In contrast, frailty by the SOF index was not correlated with hospitalization (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.68-3.01). Prevalence of frailty was higher in Korea compared to previous studies in other countries. A novel frailty index (KFI), which includes domains of comprehensive geriatric assessment, is a valid criterion for the evaluation and prediction of frailty in the Korean elderly population.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 055151220

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24505338

Related references

Frailty prevalence and factors associated with the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index: Findings from the North West Adelaide Health Study. Australasian Journal on Ageing 37(2): 120-126, 2017

Frailty phenotype, frailty index and risk of mortality in Chinese elderly population- Rugao longevity and ageing study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 80: 115-119, 2018

Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in elderly patients with cancer. Acta Oncologica 55(5): 644-646, 2017

Correlates of frailty phenotype and frailty index and their associations with clinical outcomes. HIV Medicine 18(10): 764-771, 2017

Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype. Experimental Gerontology 79: 55-60, 2017

Components of the Frailty Phenotype in Relation to the Frailty Index: Results From the Toulouse Frailty Platform. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16(10): 855-859, 2016

The prevalence of frailty and related factors in community-dwelling Turkish elderly according to modified Fried Frailty Index and FRAIL scales. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 27(5): 703-709, 2016

Prevalence of frailty in a Spanish elderly population: the Frailty and Dependence in Albacete study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59(7): 1356-1359, 2011

Prevalence of frailty and factors associated with frailty in the elderly population of Lleida, Spain: the FRALLE survey. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 55(3): 625-631, 2013

Predictors of frailty development in a general population of older adults in Japan using the Frailty Index for Japanese elderly patients. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics 49(4): 442-448, 2013

Diagnostic Test of a Scoring System for Frailty Syndrome in the Elderly According to Cardiovascular Health Study, Study of Osteoporotic Fracture and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Based Frailty Index Compared with Frailty Index 40 Items. Acta Medica Indonesiana 47(3): 183-187, 2016

A clinical frailty index in aging mice: comparisons with frailty index data in humans. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 69(6): 621-632, 2014

Comparison and Clinical Applications of the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index Approaches. Interdisciplinary Topics in Gerontology and Geriatrics 41: 74-84, 2016

Frailty phenotype and frailty index are associated with distinct neuromuscular electrophysiological characteristics in men. Experimental Physiology 2019, 2019

Phenotype of frailty: the influence of each item in determining frailty in community-dwelling elderly - The Fibra Study. Ciencia and Saude Coletiva 21(11): 3483-3492, 2018