+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prevalence and presentation of externalized conductors and electrical abnormalities in Riata defibrillator leads after fluoroscopic screening: report from the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee



Prevalence and presentation of externalized conductors and electrical abnormalities in Riata defibrillator leads after fluoroscopic screening: report from the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee



Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 5(6): 1059-1063



The Riata family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is prone to a specific insulation abrasion characterized by externalization of conductor cables. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of externalized conductors and electrical abnormalities in Riata ICD leads by fluoroscopic screening and standard ICD interrogation. All ICD implantation centers were contacted by the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee to identify all patients with an active Riata ICD lead and to perform fluoroscopic screening of the lead. In addition, the electrical integrity of the lead was assessed. As of March 1, 2012, data for 1029 active Riata leads were available; 47% of these were 8-F Riata and 53% were 7-F Riata ST. Externalized conductors were observed in 147 leads (14.3%). Proportion of externalized conductors was higher in 8-F Riata compared with 7-F Riata ST (21.4% vs 8.0%; P<0.001). Median time from implantation to detection of externalized conductors was 65.3 months. The estimated rates of externalized conductors were 6.9% and 36.6% at 5 and 8 years after implantation, respectively. Of the 147 leads with externalized conductors, 10.9% had abnormal electrical parameters vs 3.5% in nonexternalized leads (P<0.001). The prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata leads is significantly high (14.3%) using fluoroscopic screening. The majority of externalized conductors are not detectable with standard ICD interrogation. Screening with fluoroscopy is reasonable.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055151702

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23091049

DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.975755


Related references

Nationwide Longitudinal Follow-Up of Riata Leads Under Advisory at 3 Annual Screenings: Report From the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee. Jacc. Clinical Electrophysiology 3(8): 887-893, 2018

Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study. Heart Rhythm 10(12): 1778-1782, 2014

The Canadian experience with Durata and Riata ST Optim defibrillator leads: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee. Heart Rhythm 10(10): 1478-1481, 2014

Fluoroscopic and electrical assessment of a series of defibrillation leads: prevalence of externalized conductors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 35(12): 1498-1504, 2013

Contribution of ethylenetetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) insulation to the electrical performance of Riata® silicone leads having externalized conductors. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 37(2): 141-145, 2014

Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee. Heart Rhythm 5(5): 639-642, 2008

High prevalence of insulation failure with externalized cables in St. Jude Medical Riata family ICD leads: fluoroscopic grading scale and correlation to extracted leads. Heart Rhythm 9(8): 1218-1224, 2013

Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 37(1): 63-68, 2014

Nationwide fluoroscopic screening of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark. Heart Rhythm 10(6): 821-827, 2014

Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee. Circulation 121(22): 2384-2387, 2010

Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark. Heart Rhythm 11(12): 2141-2147, 2015

Letter by Maytin and Epstein et al regarding article, "Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee". Circulation 123(10): E375-E375, 2011

Riata and Riata ST defibrillator leads failure: cable externalization is one problem, but other electrical failures seem more preoccupant. European Heart Journal 34(Suppl 1): P1396-P1396, 2013

Fluoroscopic investigation of Riata® transvenous defibrillator leads. Cardiology Journal 22(1): 57-67, 2016

Failure rate of the Riata lead under advisory: a report from the CHRS Device Committee. Heart Rhythm 10(5): 692-695, 2013