+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prevention of mechanical failures in implanted spinal cord stimulation systems



Prevention of mechanical failures in implanted spinal cord stimulation systems



Neuromodulation 9(3): 183-191



Introduction.  Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective procedure for the treatment of neuropathic extremity pain, with success rates approaching 70%. However, mechanical failures, including breakage and migration, can significantly limit the long-term effectiveness of SCS. A systematic analysis of surgical techniques was undertaken by a consensus group, coupled with extensive in vivo and in vitro biomechanical testing of system components. Methods.  A computer model based on morphometric data was used to predict movement in a standard SCS system between an anchored lead and pulse generator placed in various locations. These displacements were then used to determine a realistic range of forces exerted on components of the SCS system. Laboratory fixtures were constructed to subject leads and anchors to repetitive stresses until failure occurred. An in vivo sheep model also was used to determine system compliances and failure thresholds in a biologically realistic setting. A panel of experienced implanters then interpreted the results and related them to clinical observations. Results.  Use of a soft silastic anchor pushed through the fascia to provide a larger bend radius for the lead was associated with a time to failure 65 times longer than an anchored but unsupported lead. In addition, failures of surgical paddle leads occurred when used with an anchor, whereas without an anchor, no failures occurred to 1 million cycles. Based on these findings, the panel recommended a paramedian approach, abdominal pulse generator placement, maximizing bend radius by pushing the anchor through the fascia, and anchoring of the extension connector near the lead anchor. Discussion.  Several factors are important in longevity of SCS systems. We discovered that technical factors can make a large difference in SCS reliability and that strict attention to these "best practices" will provide the best chance for maintaining the integrity of SCS systems over the long term.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055169375

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22151706

DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00059.x


Related references

Efficacy and Complications Profile of Surgically Implanted Versus Percutaneously Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems. Anesthesiology Abstracts of Scientific Papers Annual Meeting ( ): Abstract No A-928, 2002

Spontaneous lead breakage in implanted spinal cord stimulation systems. Korean Journal of Pain 23(1): 78-81, 2010

Implanted functional neuromuscular stimulation systems for individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries: Clinical case reports. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 77(11): 1119-1128, 1996

Hardware failures in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic benign pain of spinal origin. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement 97(Pt 1): 101-104, 2007

Abdominal electrical stimulation rescues failures to penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury: a report of two cases. Urology 68(1): 204.E9, 2006

Clinical Outcomes of 1 kHz Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Implanted Patients With Failed Paresthesia-Based Stimulation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Neuromodulation 19(7): 731-737, 2016

Hardware failures in spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 3(1): 27-30, 2000

Intraoperative stimulation of the spinal cord for prevention of spinal cord injury. Advances in Neurology 63: 271-288, 1993

High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with an Implanted Cardiac Device. Pain Practice 17(4): 558-563, 2017

Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina in a patient implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 30(1): 143-146, 2007

Chronically implanted electrodes for repeated stimulation and recording of spinal cord potentials. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 141(1): 125-134, 2005

Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous leads after loss of coverage with implanted surgical lead. Neuromodulation 13(2): 117-120, 2010

Evolving patterns of spinal cord stimulation in patients implanted for intractable low back and leg pain. Neuromodulation 5(3): 167-179, 2002

Pain therapy with external and implanted pump systems near the spinal cord. Krankenpflege Journal 29(11): 497-498, 1991

Application of 2 vibrators salvages ejaculatory failures to 1 vibrator during penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Urology 177(2): 660-663, 2007