+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment

Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment

Bmc Health Services Research 14: 360

Prioritising scarce resources for investment in innovation by publically funded health systems is unavoidable. Many healthcare systems wish to foster transparency and accountability in the decisions they make by incorporating the public in decision-making processes. This paper presents a unique conceptual approach exploring the public's preferences for health service innovations by viewing healthcare innovations as 'bundles' of characteristics. This decompositional approach allows policy-makers to compare numerous competing health service innovations without repeatedly administering surveys for specific innovation choices. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was used to elicit preferences. Individuals chose from presented innovation options that they believe the UK National Health Service (NHS) should invest the most in. Innovations differed according to: (i) target population; (ii) target age; (iii) implementation time; (iv) uncertainty associated with their likely effects; (v) potential health benefits; and, (vi) cost to a taxpayer. This approach fosters multidimensional decision-making, rather than imposing a single decision criterion (e.g., cost, target age) in prioritisation. Choice data was then analysed using scale-adjusted Latent Class models to investigate variability in preferences and scale and valuations amongst respondents. Three latent classes with considerable heterogeneity in the preferences were present. Each latent class is composed of two consumer subgroups varying in the level of certainty in their choices. All groups preferred scientifically proven innovations, those with potential health benefits that cost less. There were, however, some important differences in their preferences for innovation investment choices: Class-1 (54%) prefers innovations benefitting adults and young people and does not prefer innovations targeting people with 'drug addiction' and 'obesity'. Class- 2 (34%) prefers innovations targeting 'cancer' patients only and has negative preferences for innovations targeting elderly, and Class-3 (12%) prefers spending on elderly and cancer patients the most. DCE can help policy-makers incorporate public preferences for health service innovation investment choices into decision making. The findings provide useful information on the public's valuation and acceptability of potential health service innovations. Such information can be used to guide innovation prioritisation decisions by comparing competing innovation options. The approach in this paper makes, these often implicit and opaque decisions, more transparent and explicit.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055186384

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25167926

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-360

Related references

Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy. Bmj Open 5(10): E008919, 2016

Improving the public health sector in South Africa: eliciting public preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy and Planning 30(5): 600-611, 2016

Public preferences for One Health approaches to emerging infectious diseases: A discrete choice experiment. Social Science and Medicine 228: 164-171, 2019

Public preferences for prioritizing preventive and curative health care interventions: a discrete choice experiment. Value in Health 18(2): 224-233, 2015

The interim service preferences of parents waiting for children's mental health treatment: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 41(6): 865-877, 2013

Investigating the preferences of older people for telehealth as a new model of health care service delivery: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 23(2): 301-313, 2016

Varying Opinions on Who Deserves Collectively Financed Health Care Services: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Allocation Preferences of the General Public. Inquiry 55: 46958017751981, 2018

Preferences for prenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell disorder: A discrete choice experiment comparing potential service users and health-care providers. Health Expectations 20(6): 1289-1295, 2017

Hospital service quality - patient preferences - a discrete choice experiment. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 31(7): 676-683, 2018

Public preferences for counseling regarding antidepressant use during pregnancy: a discrete choice experiment. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology 94(7): 532-539, 2013

Health system choice: a pilot discrete-choice experiment eliciting the preferences of British and Australian citizens. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 8(2): 89-97, 2011

Public Preferences for Genetic Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Value in Health 17(7): A647, 2014

Testing for sexually transmitted infections among students: a discrete choice experiment of service preferences. Bmj Open 3(10): E003240, 2013

Employment preferences of public sector nurses in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment. Tropical Medicine and International Health 13(12): 1433-1441, 2008

Preferences of older patients regarding hip fracture rehabilitation service configuration: A feasibility discrete choice experiment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 50(7): 636-642, 2018