+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater



Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater



Bioresource Technology 99(18): 8559-8564



In this study a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated sludge plant (CASP), treating the same tannery wastewaters and in the same operating conditions, have been compared in order to evaluate the overall treatment efficiency, the presence and distribution of Gram negative bacteria and the kinetics of nitrifying bacteria. Process efficiency was evaluated in terms of organic and nitrogen compounds: the MBR showed a higher COD removal (+4%) and a more stable and complete nitrification. The Gram negative bacteria were detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with phylogenetic probes monitoring of alpha-, beta- and gamma-Proteobacteria, of the main ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria of the Nitrobacter and Nitrospira genera. The results showed that the main differences between the two sludges were: the higher abundance of alpha- and gamma-Proteobacteria in the MBR bioreactor and the presence of AOB aggregates only on the surfaces of MBR flocs. Finally, the titrimetric (pH-stat, DO-stat) tests showed similar values of the kinetic parameters of the nitrifiers both in MBR and CASP sludge.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055197250

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18499451

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.006


Related references

Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR and CASP treatment of tannery wastewater. Bioresource Technology: 18, 8559-8564, 2008

Analysis of characteristics of microbial communities in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge process. Huan Jing Ke Xue= Huanjing Kexue 30(2): 499-503, 2009

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge inoculation in a hybrid process scheme concept to assist overloaded conventional activated sludge (CAS) process operations. Water Science and Technology 66(2): 457-463, 2012

Removal of indicator bacteriophages from municipal wastewater by a full-scale membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process: implications to water reuse. Bioresource Technology 129: 526-531, 2013

Fate of aromatic hydrocarbons in Italian municipal wastewater systems: an overview of wastewater treatment using conventional activated-sludge processes (CASP) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Water Research 45(1): 93, 2011

Comparison of sludge filtration characteristics between a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process. Huan Jing Ke Xue= Huanjing Kexue 27(2): 315-318, 2006

Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. Water Research 43(3): 831-841, 2009

A comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge process. Huan Jing Ke Xue= Huanjing Kexue 22(3): 20-24, 2001

Start-up of the Anammox process from the conventional activated sludge in a membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology 100(9): 2501-2506, 2009

Startup of the Anammox Process in a Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) from Conventional Activated Sludge. Water Environment Research 88(12): 2268-2274, 2016

Improved treatment of tannery wastewater using Zoogloea ramigera and its extracellular polymer in an activated sludge process. Biotechnology Letters 18(8): 917-922, 1996

Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment. Chemosphere 67(2): 335-343, 2007

Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated-sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high-molecular-weight compounds. Water Environment Research 71(1): 70, 1999

Effects of 4-chlorophenol wastewater treatment on sludge acute toxicity, microbial diversity and functional genes expression in an activated sludge process. Bioresource Technology 265: 39-44, 2018

Comparison of a system using immobilized microorganisms with a conventional activated sludge process for wastewater treatment. Wijffels, R H, Buitelaar, R M, Bucke, C, Tramper, J Progress in Biotechnology, Vol 11; Immobilized cells: Basics and applications 710-717, 1996