+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Processing Conventional Conceptual Metaphors in Persian: A Corpus-Based Psycholinguistic Study



Processing Conventional Conceptual Metaphors in Persian: A Corpus-Based Psycholinguistic Study



Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(5): 495-518



Research on the psycholinguistic processing of conceptual metaphors has produced contrasting results in recent years. There have also been criticisms that in experimental studies of metaphor processing, linguistic stimuli are mostly intuition-based and not designed objectively based on the original language use data. To address these issues, we studied the processing of conventional metaphoric expressions in Persian language using corpus data. A reading time experiment was designed to test whether conventional metaphoric expressions activated conceptual metaphors. A corpus of 50 million word tokens was used to study the conventional patterns of metaphoric expressions usages and construct experimental items. Fifty five Persian speakers read a set of scenarios containing non-conventional metaphor, conventional metaphor and non-metaphor expressions on computer and the reading times of the following novel target sentence in each condition were recorded by DMDX stimulus presenter program. Comparing mean reading times using one-way ANOVA revealed that reading target sentence after conventional metaphor scenarios had been significantly faster than non-metaphor scenarios, but slower than non-conventional scenarios. The results show that conventionality has a weakening effect on the strength of metaphoric expressions to activate conceptual metaphors.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055197839

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24809959

DOI: 10.1007/s10936-014-9299-1


Related references

A new set of 272 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: Persian norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods 47(4): 1148-1158, 2016

ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and Language 127(3): 484-496, 2014

How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68(8): 1623-1642, 2016

Conceptual restrictions on English: A psycholinguistic study. Lingua 23: 209-232, 1969

Pun processing from a psycholinguistic perspective: Introducing the Model of Psycholinguistic Hemispheric Incongruity Laughter (M.PHIL). Laterality 21(4-6): 455-483, 2016

Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2): 521-540, 2008

The repetition paradigm: enhancement of novel metaphors and suppression of conventional metaphors in the left inferior parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia 50(12): 2705-2719, 2013

Stronger left-hemisphere lateralization in older versus younger adults while processing conventional metaphors. Laterality 19(6): 705-717, 2015

Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(3): 612-625, 1995

A dataset of metaphors from the italian literature: exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context. Plos One 9(9): E105634-E105634, 2015

Memory-based language processing: psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 25-42, 1998

Contextual effects on conceptual blending in metaphors An event-related potential study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26(2), 2013

Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study. Brain Research 1284: 145-155, 2009

A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language 101(2): 103-150, 2006

A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language 91(1): 64-65, 2004