+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial



Prone positioning of obese patients for colonoscopy results in shortened cecal intubation times: a randomized trial



Digestive Diseases and Sciences 58(3): 782-787



Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer, and colonoscopy can be technically challenging in obese patients. It has been proposed (with little supporting data) that prone positioning of obese patients might facilitate a difficult colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine if starting colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients decreases cecal intubation times. This was a prospective, randomized study conducted at the North Texas VA Medical Center. Patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m(2) undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to either initial prone positioning or standard, left-lateral positioning. The outcome measurements were cecal intubation time, frequency of repositioning, sedative medications used, reports of pain, complications, and procedure tolerability. Fifty patients were randomized to have colonoscopy starting in the standard, left-lateral decubitus position, and 51 to the prone position. The average cecal intubation time for the standard group was 550 vs. 424 s in the prone group (p = 0.03). Patient repositioning was used in 28 % of patients in the standard group versus 8 % in the prone group (p = 0.009). There was no difference in subjective reports of pain between groups (p = 0.95) or in average pain scores (p = 0.79). Follow-up interviews were conducted in 93 % of patients, all of whom said that they would be willing to have repeat colonoscopy in the same position. Performance of colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients results in significantly shorter cecal intubation times and decreased need for patient repositioning. Prone positioning is well accepted and does not significantly increase procedure-related discomfort.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055228846

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23143737

DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2468-x


Related references

Awake endotracheal intubation and prone patient self-positioning: anesthetic and positioning considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients. Journal of Endourology 23(10): 1599-1602, 2009

Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 77(5): 767-773, 2013

Tu1322 Water Exchange Enhanced Cecal Intubation in Potentially Difficult Colonoscopy - Unsedated Patients With Prior Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery: a Prospective Randomized, Controlled Trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 77(5): Ab498-Ab499, 2013

Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy 33(1): 60-64, 2001

Self-positioning following awake fiberoptic intubation is a safe and well-tolerated procedure for positioning of the morbid obese patient in the prone position. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 30: 20-20, 2013

Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 42(7): 885-889, 2007

Prone or Left for Colonoscopy? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prone Versus Left-sided Starting Position for Colonoscopy. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 52(10): E82-E86, 2017

The impact of patient positioning on pressure ulcers in patients with severe ARDS: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial on prone positioning. Intensive Care Medicine 40(3): 397-403, 2014

Cecal intubation time between cap-assisted water exchange and water exchange colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 29(11): 1296-1302, 2017

Alverine citrate plus simethicone reduces cecal intubation time in colonoscopy - a randomized study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 19(3): 174-179, 2008

Self-positioning followed by induction of anaesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation and subsequent positioning for spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomised clinical trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 31(5): 259-265, 2014

Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy - a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 50(7): 916-923, 2015

Prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302(18): 1977-1984, 2009

A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. RadioTherapy and Oncology 70(1): 37-44, 2004

Double-Balloon Colonoscopy Has a Higher Cecal Intubation Rate Than Conventional Colonoscopy Using a Colon Simulator. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 62(4): 979-983, 2017