+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Public health communication with frontline clinicians during the first wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic

Public health communication with frontline clinicians during the first wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 17(1): 36-44

During public health emergencies, office-based frontline clinicians are critical partners in the detection, treatment, and control of disease. Communication between public health authorities and frontline clinicians is critical, yet public health agencies, medical societies, and healthcare delivery organizations have all called for improvements. Describe communication processes between public health and frontline clinicians during the first wave of the 2009 novel influenza A(H1N1) pandemic; assess clinicians' use of and knowledge about public health guidance; and assess clinicians' perceptions and preferences about communication during a public health emergency. During the first wave of the pandemic, we performed a process analysis and surveyed 509 office-based primary care providers in Utah. Public health and healthcare leaders from major agencies involved in emergency response in Utah and office-based primary care providers located throughout Utah. Communication process and information flow, distribution of e-mails, proportion of clinicians who accessed key Web sites at least weekly, clinicians' knowledge about recent guidance and perception about e-mail load, primary information sources, and qualitative findings from clinician feedback. The process analysis revealed redundant activities and messaging. The 141 survey respondents (28%) received information from a variety of sources: 68% received information from state public health; almost 100% received information from health care organizations. Only one-third visited a state public health or institutional Web site frequently enough (at least weekly) to obtain updated guidance. Clinicians were knowledgeable about guidance that did not change during the first wave; however, correct knowledge was lower after guidance changed. Clinicians felt overwhelmed by e-mail volume, preferred a single institutional e-mail for clinical guidance, and suggested that new information be concise and clearly identified. : Communication between public health, health care organizations and clinicians was redundant and overwhelming and can be enhanced considering clinician preferences and institutional communication channels.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055283266

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21135659

DOI: 10.1097/phh.0b013e3181ee9b29

Related references

Effectiveness of seasonal 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and pandemic vaccines, to prevent influenza hospitalizations during the autumn 2009 influenza pandemic wave in Castellón, Spain. A test-negative, hospital-based, case-control study. Vaccine 28(47): 7460-7467, 2011

Media use and communication inequalities in a public health emergency: a case study of 2009-2010 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1. Public Health Reports 129(Suppl. 4): 49-60, 2014

Evidence of the circulation of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 with D222D/G/N/S hemagglutinin polymorphisms during the first wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Journal of Clinical Virology 52(4): 304-306, 2012

Pregnant and recently pregnant women's perceptions about influenza a pandemic (H1N1) 2009: implications for public health and provider communication. Maternal and Child Health Journal 16(8): 1657-1664, 2013

Knowledge, attitudes, experience and behaviour of frontline health care workers during the early phase of 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic, Birmingham, UK. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 20(1): 26-30, 2016

Serologically confirmed household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus during the first pandemic wave--New York City, April-May 2009. Clinical Infectious Diseases 53(5): 455-462, 2012

Public health preparedness for two mass gathering events in the context of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009--Serbia, July 2009. Euro Surveillance 14(31), 2009

Reassortment ability of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus with circulating human and avian influenza viruses: public health risk implications. Virus Research 175(2): 151-154, 2014

The limitations of point of care testing for pandemic influenza: what clinicians and public health professionals need to know. Canadian Journal of Public Health 100(3): 204-207, 2009

Reflections on public health surveillance of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza in NSW. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin 21(1-2): 19-25, 2010

Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza in NSW: an overview of the public health response. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin 21(1-2): 4-9, 2010

Impact of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic on public health workers in the Netherlands. Euro Surveillance 16(7), 2011

Public health preparedness laws and policies: where do we go after pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza?. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39(Suppl. 1): 51-55, 2011

Public health management of antiviral drugs during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a survey of local health departments in California. Bmc Public Health 12: 82, 2012

Survey of distribution of seasonal influenza vaccine doses in 201 countries (2004-2015): The 2003 World Health Assembly resolution on seasonal influenza vaccination coverage and the 2009 influenza pandemic have had very little impact on improving influenza control and pandemic preparedness. Vaccine 35(36): 4681-4686, 2017