+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Publication bias for CAM trials in the highest impact factor medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias



Publication bias for CAM trials in the highest impact factor medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias



Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60(11): 1123-1126



To assess the presence of publication bias and its relation to geographical bias in clinical trials involving complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) published in the highest impact factor general medicine journals. All CAM clinical trials published in the four highest impact factor general medicine journals, Lancet and British Medical Journal (European), and New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of American Medical Association (U.S.), between 1965 and 2004 were abstracted using Medline. Three reviewers abstracted data from the individual studies. In a multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a positive study were assessed. A total of 259 studies met the inclusion criteria. CAM trials published in the European journals were significantly more likely to be positive compared to those published in the U.S. journals (76% vs. 50%, odds ratio [OR]=3.15, P<0.0001). Studies originating outside of the United States were significantly more likely to be positive compared to the U.S. studies (75% vs. 49%, P<0.0001). Adjusting for location and other variables in a multivariate model, the OR for European vs. U.S. journals to publish a positive CAM trial was 1.95 (P=0.11). Publication bias related to CAM trials among the highest impact factor general medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055285012

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17938053

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.01.009


Related references

Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67(12): 1320-1326, 2015

Possible Bias in the Publication Trends of High Impact Factor Anesthesiology and Gastroenterology Journals -An Analysis of 5 Years' Data. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches 12(3): 611-617, 2018

Su1035 - Possible Bias in the Publication Trends of High Impact Factor Gastroenterology and Anesthesiology Journals - An Analysis of 5 Years' Data. Gastroenterology 154(6): S-462, 2018

Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: an observation on published controlled trials. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 38(1): 4-10, 2010

Full publication of clinical trials presented at a national maternal-fetal medicine meeting: is there a publication bias?. American Journal of Perinatology 26(9): 679-682, 2010

Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials in high-impact ophthalmology journals and general medical journals: a systematic review. British Journal of Ophthalmology 101(10): 1309-1314, 2017

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study. BMJ 331(7517): 637-638, 2005

Publication bias of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine 13(1): 102-108, 2005

Communication of research findings in peer-reviewed journals Publication bias, timing of publication, conflicting interests and fraud. Science of the Total Environment 184(1-2): 129-130, 1996

The specter of publication bias: adjustment for publication bias in the evidence on cardiac death associated with passive smoking in nonsmoking women. International Journal of Cardiology 149(3): 388-389, 2011

Do journals have a publication bias?. Maturitas 57(1): 16-19, 2007

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: mandatory publication of data may help. BMJ 331(7517): 638-638, 2005

Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias. Peerj 5: E4115, 2017

Impact of mandatory registration of clinical trials on small medical journals: scenario on emerging bias. Croatian Medical Journal 47(1): 181-2; Author Reply 182-3, 2006

Publication bias and journals as policemen. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 44(8): 1707-1708, 2004