+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis



Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis



Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making 14: 71



Shared Decision Making (SDM) is increasingly advocated as a model for medical decision making. However, there is still low use of SDM in clinical practice. High impact factor journals might represent an efficient way for its dissemination. We aimed to identify and characterize publication trends of SDM in 15 high impact medical journals. We selected the 15 general and internal medicine journals with the highest impact factor publishing original articles, letters and editorials. We retrieved publications from 1996 to 2011 through the full-text search function on each journal website and abstracted bibliometric data. We included publications of any type containing the phrase "shared decision making" or five other variants in their abstract or full text. These were referred to as SDM publications. A polynomial Poisson regression model with logarithmic link function was used to assess the evolution across the period of the number of SDM publications according to publication characteristics. We identified 1285 SDM publications out of 229,179 publications in 15 journals from 1996 to 2011. The absolute number of SDM publications by journal ranged from 2 to 273 over 16 years. SDM publications increased both in absolute and relative numbers per year, from 46 (0.32% relative to all publications from the 15 journals) in 1996 to 165 (1.17%) in 2011. This growth was exponential (P < 0.01). We found fewer research publications (465, 36.2% of all SDM publications) than non-research publications, which included non-systematic reviews, letters, and editorials. The increase of research publications across time was linear. Full-text search retrieved ten times more SDM publications than a similar PubMed search (1285 vs. 119 respectively). This review in full-text showed that SDM publications increased exponentially in major medical journals from 1996 to 2011. This growth might reflect an increased dissemination of the SDM concept to the medical community.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055285263

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25106844

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-71


Related references

Review and Analysis of Publication Trends over Three Decades in Three High Impact Medicine Journals. Plos One 12(1): E0170056, 2017

Retrieval of publications addressing shared decision making: an evaluation of full-text searches on medical journal websites. Jmir Research Protocols 4(2): E38, 2015

Representation of Nursing Scientists from German-speaking countries in High Impact Journals. A bibliometric publication analysis. Pflege 31(1): 31-39, 2018

Scientific Publication Performance of Turkish Anaesthesia Clinics in High Impact Factor International Journals Between 2005 and 2014: A Bibliometric Analysis. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation 45(1): 16-25, 2017

Publication trends in social psychology journals: A long-term bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology 43(1): 9-11, 2013

Possible Bias in the Publication Trends of High Impact Factor Anesthesiology and Gastroenterology Journals -An Analysis of 5 Years' Data. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches 12(3): 611-617, 2018

Su1035 - Possible Bias in the Publication Trends of High Impact Factor Gastroenterology and Anesthesiology Journals - An Analysis of 5 Years' Data. Gastroenterology 154(6): S-462, 2018

Publication trends of Allergy, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, and Clinical and Translational Allergy journals: a MeSH term-based bibliometric analysis. Clinical and Translational Allergy 8: 6, 2018

The role of doctor's opinion in shared decision making: what does shared decision making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures?. Health Expectations 8(2): 97-102, 2005

A longitudinal analysis of bibliometric and impact factor trends among the core international journals of nursing, 1977-2008. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47(12): 1491-1499, 2011

Trends in Foot and Ankle Studies Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals: A Systematic Review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 2019, 2019

Trends in High-Impact Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurgery 2019, 2019

Writing for publication in medical education in high impact journals. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 18(19): 2966-2981, 2015

A bibliometric analysis of academic publication on diabetic retinopathy disease trends during 1980-2014: a global and medical view. International Journal of Ophthalmology 9(11): 1663-1668, 2016

Can the similarity index predict the causes of retractions in high-impact anesthesia journals? A bibliometric analysis. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 13(Suppl 1): S2-S8, 2019