+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Quality of life among the traumatic spinal cord injured patients



Quality of life among the traumatic spinal cord injured patients



Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 94(10): 1252-1259



To study the quality of life among the traumatic spinal cord injured patients and to identify the factors related with the quality of life in the good level of such patients. The traumatic SCI patients who had been treated in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from January 2003 until August 2009 were interviewed for the demographic data. The injury related data were obtained from the medical records. The WHOQOL-BREF-Thai was used to acquire the QOL score, which would be interpreted as poor fair, and good QOL level according to the questionnaire. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale and the modified Barthel Index (BI) were used to assess depression, and functional disability respectively. The median split method was used to divide the participants into two groups as good and poor QOL groups. The Chi-square and Independent Sample t-test were performed to determine the difference between these two groups and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the factors associated with the good QOL. P-value < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance. Sixty-seven patients (49 males and 18 females) with a mean age 36.54 +/- 11.46 years old participated the present study. They suffered from traffic accident 67.2%, gunshot 16.4%, fall from a height 11.9%, and others 4.5%. The injury levels were cervical 31.3%, thoracic 50.7%, and lumbosacral 18%. Most of them (60.6%) had incomplete lesion. Eighteen patients (26.1%) reported depression. The mean BI score was 69.71 +/- 29.42. Three (4.5%), forty-nine (73.1%), and fifteen (22.4%) participants reported their QOL score in the range of poor, fair and good levels respectively. Using the median split method, participants with a score over 82 were classified as having good QOL groups and the rest were classified as having poor QOL group. When considering the score in each domain of the WHOQOL questionnaire, the differences between the good and poor QOL groups had statistical significance. The sufficient income (OR 13.67, 95% CI: 3.1-60.22, p = 0.001), having no depression (OR 7.6, 95% CI: 1.17-49.22, p = 0.033), and being employed (OR 6.88, 95% CI: 1.44-32.94, p = 0.016) were significantly related with the good QOL. Most of the SCI patients determined their QOL as fair level. Sufficient income, having no depression, and being employed were associated with the good QOL.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 055308718

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22145512


Related references

Quality of life of traumatic spinal cord injured patients in Hong Kong. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 40(2): 126-131, 2008

Quality of marital life in Korean spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 36(12): 826-831, 1998

Quality of life of spinal cord injured patients in Taiwan: A subgroup study. Spinal Cord 35(12): 841-849, 1997

Domain-specific quality of life assesment in spinal cord injured patients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift für Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale de Recherches de Readaptation 30(2): 97, 2007

Relationship between effective coping and perceived quality of life in spinal cord injured patients. Rehabilitation Nursing 16(3): 129-132, 1991

Expansion duroplasty improves intraspinal pressure, spinal cord perfusion pressure, and vascular pressure reactivity index in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study. Journal of Neurotrauma 32(12): 865-874, 2015

Quality of life evaluation in spinal cord injured patients comparing different bladder management techniques. Actas Urologicas Espanolas 34(6): 537-542, 2010

An overview of published research about the acute care and rehabilitation of traumatic brain injured and spinal cord injured patients. Journal of Neurotrauma 29(8): 1539-1547, 2012

MMPI-2 profiles in traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injured patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 52(5): 573-579, 1996

The Brindley Bladder Stimulator Improves Quality Of Life In Spinal Cord Injured Patients As Compared To A Matched Control Group. The Journal of Urology 181(4): 341-342, 2009

An analysis of the length of stay in traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injured patients. A rehabilitation unit experience in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 31(5): 555-559, 2010

Effects of different bladder management methods on the quality of life in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 51(3): 226-231, 2013

Comparison of health related quality of life between two groups of veteran and non-veteran spinal cord injured patients. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran 29: 198, 2015

Prevalence and risk-factors of neurogenic heterotopic ossification in traumatic spinal cord and traumatic brain injured patients admitted to specialised units in Australia. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 14(1): 19-28, 2014

Anxiety and depression among traumatic spinal cord injured patients. Neurosciences 17(2): 145-150, 2012