EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve in rats using arterial spin labeling MRI: comparison with a fluorescent microsphere technique



Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve in rats using arterial spin labeling MRI: comparison with a fluorescent microsphere technique



Nmr in Biomedicine 24(9): 1047-1053



To quantify noninvasively myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MBF reserve in isoflurane-anesthetized rats using the Look-Locker flow-alternating inversion recovery gradient-echo arterial spin labeling technique (LLFAIRGE-ASL), and to compare the results with the fluorescent microsphere (FM) technique. Male Wistar rats (weight = 200-240 g, n = 21) were anesthetized with 2.0% isoflurane. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded. In seven rats, MBF was assessed on a Bruker Biospec 4.7T MR system using an ECG- and respiration-gated LLFAIRGE-ASL (pixel size = 234 × 468µm(2) , TE = 1.52ms) at rest and during adenosine infusion (140 µg/kg/min). A mixture of 200 000 FM was injected into a second group of rats at rest and during adenosine infusion (n = 7 each), under similar physiologic conditions. Hearts and skeletal muscle samples were processed for fluorescence spectroscopy. Two-tailed unpaired, paired Student's t-test and ANOVA were used to compare groups. MBF measured with LLFAIRGE-ASL was 5.2 ± 1.0 mL/g/min at rest and 13.3 ± 3.0 mL/g/min during adenosine infusion. Results obtained with fluorescent microspheres yielded 5.9 ± 2.3 mL/g/min (nonsignificant vs. LLFAIRGE-ASL, p = 0.9) at rest and 13.1 ± 2.1 mL/g/min (nonsignificant vs. LLFAIRGE-ASL, p = 0.4) during adenosine infusion. Myocardial blood flow reserve measured using LLFAIRGE-ASL and FM were not significantly different (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.4 ± 0.9, respectively; p = 0.8). Hemodynamic parameters during the experiments were not different between the groups. The myocardial blood flow reserve determined under isoflurane anesthesia was 2.5 ± 0.6, which was not different from the value obtained with FM. LLFAIRGE-ASL provided MBF maps with high spatial resolution in rats under isoflurane anesthesia. LLFAIRGE-ASL is a noninvasive measure to assess myocardial blood flow reserve and provides an interesting tool for cardiovascular research.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055314027

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21264978

DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1645



Related references

Cerebral blood flow quantification in the rat: a direct comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI with radioactive microsphere PET. Ejnmmi Research 2(1): 47-47, 2012

Comparison of retinal and cerebral blood flow between continuous arterial spin labeling MRI and fluorescent microsphere techniques. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 40(3): 609-615, 2015

Accurate myocardial T1 measurements: toward quantification of myocardial blood flow with arterial spin labeling. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 53(5): 1135-1142, 2005

Assessment of segmental myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve by adenosine-stress myocardial arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 46(2): 413-420, 2017

Assessment of regional myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve using myocardial contrast echocardiography with power pulse imaging Comparison with neutron activated microsphere. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 37(2 Supplement A): 423A-424A, February, 2001

Experimental comparison of four FAIR arterial spin labeling techniques for quantification of mouse cerebral blood flow at 4.7 T. Nmr in Biomedicine 21(8): 781-792, 2008

Quantification of rodent cerebral blood flow (CBF) in normal and high flow states using pulsed arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 26(4): 855-862, 2007

Unilateral fetal-type circle of Willis anatomy causes right-left asymmetry in cerebral blood flow with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling: A limitation of arterial spin labeling-based cerebral blood flow measurements?. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 36(9): 1570-1578, 2016

Quantification of myocardial blood flow and blood flow reserve in the presence of arterial dispersion: A simulation study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 47(4): 787-793, April, 2002

Quantification of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve with SPECT imaging technique. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018

Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228(2): 523-532, 2003

Quantification of cerebral blood flow in healthy volunteers and type 1 diabetic patients: comparison of MRI arterial spin labeling and [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 40(6): 1300-1309, 2015

Quantitative MR assessment of myocardial flow reserve in a porcine model of LAD stenosis using arterial spin labeling. Circulation 100(18 SUPPL ): I 522, Nov 2, 1999

Effects of arterial transit delay on cerebral blood flow quantification using arterial spin labeling in an elderly cohort. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2016

Absolute cerebral blood flow quantification with pulsed arterial spin labeling during hyperoxia corrected with the simultaneous measurement of the longitudinal relaxation time of arterial blood. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 67(6): 1556-1565, 2012